california dreaming - guardian 4.10.09 - Page 6 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-06-2009, 07:49 AM   #76
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,338
Local Time: 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVS View Post
Ok, 75% of homeschoolers don't like cheese and pledge alligience to a plastic Jesus. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
If you email this to me, does it make it true?
__________________

__________________
martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:51 AM   #77
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,338
Local Time: 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yolland View Post
Someone's gotta wash the dishes, pick the lettuce, slaughter the cattle, stock the shelves, lay the bricks, fix the sewers...that's not gonna change.
Daily, my husband and I ask each other where California would be without Mexican guys. They are everywhere doing extremely useful jobs.
__________________

__________________
martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 08:09 AM   #78
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 16,297
Local Time: 09:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post

Maybe the author meant 2/3rds of Hispanic kindergarten students were unable to speak English, which would be about right.
Early Intermediate 1,604 35.0%
Beginning 1,537 33.0%
And these kids are all fluent by first or second grade. It's a very common thing among immigrant groups that kids enter kindergarten not speaking very much English at all since they've spent their entire lives at home. And they all do fine, many of them eventually outperforming the anglo kids. Take a look at the Asian population for an example of children who also have high proportions of no-English at the point of kindergarten entry and then follow them through on their path to Harvard. The inability to speak English at the age of 4 isn't really indicative of anything.

I spoke just passable English until I was 12, somehow magically I managed to do something productive with my immigrant ass anyway.
__________________
anitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 08:21 AM   #79
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 08:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martha View Post
If you email this to me, does it make it true?
I'll add pictures just to make sure I cover my bases and so Diamond trust it.
__________________
BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 08:54 AM   #80
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Tiger Edge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Everglades
Posts: 4,740
Local Time: 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
And these kids are all fluent by first or second grade. It's a very common thing among immigrant groups that kids enter kindergarten not speaking very much English at all since they've spent their entire lives at home. And they all do fine, many of them eventually outperforming the anglo kids. Take a look at the Asian population for an example of children who also have high proportions of no-English at the point of kindergarten entry and then follow them through on their path to Harvard. The inability to speak English at the age of 4 isn't really indicative of anything.

I spoke just passable English until I was 12, somehow magically I managed to do something productive with my immigrant ass anyway.
It's common practice among most Hispanic families in Miami to raise young children strictly on Spanish. A few of my friends are US born, have parents that prefer English to Spanish, but nonetheless attended their first years at school as non-English speakers. They're going to learn English anyway, so might as well teach them Spanish while they're young and have no outside interference (Hey, that's the name of this forum!).
That's how my brother and I were raised also, although our parents weren't as strict on the non-English rule.
__________________
Tiger Edge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2010, 11:23 PM   #81
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 08:44 AM
Quote:
Golden No Longer
George Will
Sunday, January 10, 2010

WASHINGTON -- Dalton Trumbo (1905-1976) was a hero to the American left, partly because of his 1939 anti-war novel "Johnny Got His Gun." Trumbo's title modified the lyric "Johnny get your gun" from the World War I song "Over There." Trumbo's "Johnny" is horribly maimed in that war. Now we need a novel titled "Berkeley Got Its Liberalism." Pending that, we have Tad Friend's report, in the Jan. 4 New Yorker, on maimed Berkeley.

California, a laboratory of liberalism, is spiraling downward, driven by a huge budget deficit. So the University of California system's budget was cut 20 percent. Then the system increased in-state student fees 32 percent to ... $10,302. But that is still 70 percent below student costs at Stanford and other private institutions in California that Berkeley considers no better than it is.

Last September, Friend reports, 5,000 Berkeley employees and students rallied in Sproul Plaza, scene of protests that ignited the 1960s and helped make Ronald Reagan governor. Some protesters, says Friend, were "naked except for signs that read 'BUDGET TRANSPARENCY.'" At an indoor meeting, a "student facilitator" used a projection screen to summarize proposals, which included: "rolling strikes"; "nationalize all universities"; "socialist revolution"; "a tent city in Sacramento"; "create a shadow Board of Regents"; "occupy Wells Fargo Bank in downtown Oakland"; "worker-student control of the university"; "strike in March"; "act now, f--- March"; "capitalism is bad." Toward the end of the seven-hour meeting, participants shouted "General strike! General strike!"

In its impact on the institution, and on students trying to grip the lower rungs of the ladder of social mobility, the UC system's crisis is sad. This academic year, only one-sixth of the normal number of new faculty have been hired at Berkeley. The Cal State system -- a cut below the UC campuses -- will enroll 40,000 fewer students this year than last. But because the professoriate is overwhelmingly liberal, there is rough justice in its having to live with liberalism's consequences, which include this:

Kevin Starr, author of an eight-volume -- so far -- history of the (formerly) Golden State, says California is "on the verge" of becoming something without an American precedent -- "a failed state." William Voegeli, writing in the Claremont Review of Books, tartly says that "Rome wasn't sacked in a day, and California didn't become Argentina overnight." Indeed.

It took years for liberalism's redistributive itch to create an income tax so steeply progressive that it prompts the flight from the state of wealth-creators: "Between 1990 and 2007," Voegeli writes, "some 3.4 million more Americans moved from California to one of the other 49 states than moved to California from another state."

And the state's income tax -- liberalism codified -- intensifies the effects of business cycles on the state's revenue stream: During booms, the stream surges and stimulates government spending; during contractions, revenues dwindle but the new government spending continues.
Voegeli says that if California's spending had grown no faster than population growth and inflation from 1992 to 2006, it would have been $65 billion less in 2006, and per capita government outlays then would have equaled not those of Somalia or Mississippi but of Oregon, which is hardly "a hellish paradigm of Social Darwinism."

It took years for liberalism's mania for micromanaging life with entangling regulations to make California's once creative economy resemble Gulliver immobilized by the Lilliputians' many threads. The state, which between 1990 and 2007 lost 26 percent of its factory jobs and 35 percent of its high-tech manufacturing jobs, ranks behind only New York, another of liberalism's laboratories, in the number of outward-bound moving vans.

It took years for compassionate liberalism to make California's welfare menu contribute to the state becoming an importer of Mexico's poverty.

It took years for servile liberalism to turn the state into what Voegeli calls a "unionocracy," run by and for unionized public employees, such as public safety employees who can retire at 50 and receive 90 percent of the final year's pay for life.


Friend reports that when the seven-hour meeting ended, the protest moved to the UC president's house. Two buses carried "some hundred Berkeley students and members of AFSCME." Perfect.

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is one reason why California's government employees -- their numbers grew 24 percent between 1997 and 2007 -- are the nation's most highly compensated. And why California's economy is being suffocated by the weight of government. And why the state's budget has little left over for Berkeley.
Expect Cahl-e-four-knee-uhhh to come groveling for a tiddy sum of "Obama cash" sometime this year.
__________________
INDY500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 05:42 PM   #82
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 08:44 AM
Good news for California. They now have a chance to elect 2 candidates, Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman (for governor and U.S. senate) with proven business experience at maximizing efficiency, creating jobs and working within budgets.

Of course there is a choice. One can always vote for the big-government-liberal Democratic career politicians, Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer, who helped engineer California's current woes.
__________________
INDY500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 06:40 PM   #83
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 06:44 AM
yeah, mama grizzly bears are on the prowl

and in Blue state CA , either or both of these women have a good shot at getting elected,
2010 (scott brown) year of surprises?
__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 06:50 PM   #84
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 08:44 AM
One's from HP and one's from Ebay, right?
__________________
BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 06:58 PM   #85
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 06:44 AM
yeah,
I watched Ebay Meg's speech last night, she seemed to copy a lot of Hillary's patterns and mannerisms from 2008 campaign, it has been a funny election, I have got about 15-20 robo calls a day on my land line.
and the amount of mailers, good god, my front room looked like a paper drive.
plus these liberal to moderate GOP candidates all tried to out conservative
each other,
'I will build a fence, and capture illegals and chop them into little pieces, etc. I will cut taxes and create 3000000 new jobs"

now for the general, they will race to capture independents, and mostly campaign as outsiders, a la Scott Brown, etc. They really do have a shot at getting elected in this Blue State,
also I forgot to mention that they are billionaires, and will spend a hundred million of their own dough to get the office.

pundits on the right and left here in CA
say they got real shots
__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 07:35 PM   #86
ONE
love, blood, life
 
financeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,122
Local Time: 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
Good news for California. They now have a chance to elect 2 candidates, Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman (for governor and U.S. senate) with proven business experience at maximizing efficiency, creating jobs and working within budgets.
Carly Fiorina? Fair play, good joke.
__________________
financeguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 07:41 PM   #87
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 09:44 AM
until someone starts talking about cutting defense, they cannot be taken seriously when it comes to the deficit.

there's not much left to cut. all that's left is defense and entitlements.
__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 07:42 PM   #88
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 08:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post

pundits on the right and left here in CA
say they got real shots
So far, that's what I've read, but that Carly Fiorina may have some issues, given her company's standing when she left and the compensation she got might not sit well with the angry at Wall Street types

But will those that vote for the primary's loser show up when it matters?
__________________
BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 08:22 PM   #89
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 08:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
until someone starts talking about cutting defense, they cannot be taken seriously when it comes to the deficit.
Well maybe we can agree here. I'll listen to any pol who says everything must be on the table. Unfunded entitlements is what will bust us but I'm guessing most Americans are also ready to let Europe and Canada defend themselves. I am.
Quote:
there's not much left to cut. all that's left is defense and entitlements.
Oh I don't know, I think most Americans are also ready to forgo future $750 Billion slush funds stimulus packages or the countless government funded studies of the mating habits of insects. I am.

Randy little beetles.
__________________
INDY500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 08:36 PM   #90
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,499
Local Time: 09:44 AM
the stimulus should have been bigger. but i'm glad we agree on defense cuts. even Gates wants to see this happen.

and talking about stuff like cutting, say, the NEA, or whatever "studies" we're talking about, is absolute pennies in comparison to where the money is actually spent. that's just stuff that's done to make political points -- i.e., Jessie Helms vs. Mapplethorpe -- and doesn't do much to tackle the actual problem.

and we can also talk about going back to Clinton-era tax rates.
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zzyzx (Buy a vowel!), California Superthread Reggo Lemonade Stand Archive 1008 08-01-2008 01:49 AM
Rate my album collection. shart1780 Lemonade Stand Archive 75 02-14-2008 12:07 AM
The Toll Grows Higher Dreadsox Free Your Mind Archive 333 08-13-2005 11:09 AM
Bono was wrong! xrayjohn General Tour Discussions 26 05-23-2005 05:34 AM
The California NAACP does not speak for us Dreadsox Free Your Mind Archive 28 04-21-2005 05:02 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com