Blue Is The New Black?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

MrsSpringsteen

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
29,289
Location
Edge's beanie closet
?


NY Times

September 20, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
Blue Is the New Black
By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON

Women are getting unhappier, I told my friend Carl.

“How can you tell?” he deadpanned. “It’s always been whine-whine-whine.”

Why are we sadder? I persisted.

“Because you care,” he replied with a mock sneer. “You have feelings.”

Oh, that.

In the early ’70s, breaking out of the domestic cocoon, leaving their mothers’ circumscribed lives behind, young women felt exhilarated and bold.

But the more women have achieved, the more they seem aggrieved. Did the feminist revolution end up benefiting men more than women?

According to the General Social Survey, which has tracked Americans’ mood since 1972, and five other major studies around the world, women are getting gloomier and men are getting happier.

Before the ’70s, there was a gender gap in America in which women felt greater well-being. Now there’s a gender gap in which men feel better about their lives.

As Arianna Huffington points out in a blog post headlined “The Sad, Shocking Truth About How Women Are Feeling”: “It doesn’t matter what their marital status is, how much money they make, whether or not they have children, their ethnic background, or the country they live in. Women around the world are in a funk.”

(The one exception is black women in America, who are a bit happier than they were in 1972, but still not as happy as black men.)

Marcus Buckingham, a former Gallup researcher who has a new book out called “Find Your Strongest Life: What the Happiest and Most Successful Women Do Differently,” says that men and women passed each other midpoint on the graph of life.

“Though women begin their lives more fulfilled than men, as they age, they gradually become less happy,” Buckingham writes in his new blog on The Huffington Post, pointing out that this darker view covers feelings about marriage, money and material goods. “Men, in contrast, get happier as they get older.”

Buckingham and other experts dispute the idea that the variance in happiness is caused by women carrying a bigger burden of work at home, the “second shift.” They say that while women still do more cooking, cleaning and child-caring, the trend lines are moving toward more parity, which should make them less stressed.

When women stepped into male- dominated realms, they put more demands — and stress — on themselves. If they once judged themselves on looks, kids, hubbies, gardens and dinner parties, now they judge themselves on looks, kids, hubbies, gardens, dinner parties — and grad school, work, office deadlines and meshing a two-career marriage.

“Choice is inherently stressful,” Buckingham said in an interview. “And women are being driven to distraction.”

One area of extreme distraction is kids. “Across the happiness data, the one thing in life that will make you less happy is having children,” said Betsey Stevenson, an assistant professor at Wharton who co-wrote a paper called “The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness.” “It’s true whether you’re wealthy or poor, if you have kids late or kids early. Yet I know very few people who would tell me they wish they hadn’t had kids or who would tell me they feel their kids were the destroyer of their happiness.”

The more important things that are crowded into their lives, the less attention women are able to give to each thing.

Add this to the fact that women are hormonally more complicated and biologically more vulnerable. Women are much harder on themselves than men.

They tend to attach to other people more strongly, beat themselves up more when they lose attachments, take things more personally at work and pop far more antidepressants.

“Women have lives that become increasingly empty,” Buckingham said. “They’re doing more and feeling less.”

Another daunting thing: America is more youth and looks obsessed than ever, with an array of expensive cosmetic procedures that allow women to be their own Frankenstein Barbies.

Men can age in an attractive way while women are expected to replicate — and Restylane — their 20s into their 60s.

Buckingham says that greater prosperity has made men happier. And they are also relieved of bearing sole responsibility for their family finances, and no longer have the pressure of having women totally dependent on them.

Men also tend to fare better romantically as time wears on. There are more widows than widowers, and men have an easier time getting younger mates.

Stevenson looks on the bright side of the dark trend, suggesting that happiness is beside the point. We’re happy to have our newfound abundance of choices, she said, even if those choices end up making us unhappier.

A paradox, indeed.
 
Marcus Buckingham is HOT.

This photo makes me happy. :cute:

Buckingham_Marcus.jpg
 
Of course women are less happy, the pressure to perform so many roles is enormous , we may have gotten out of the kitchen to go to work , but we go back to the kitchen and the kids when you get home , and put in the 2nd shift .
Interesting paradox when women are opressing other women by working and having low paid and underqualified childcare workers, grandmothers and other famliy members take care of the kids .
The guilt hurts . its so hard to be present at all the important things.
The skill needed to co-ordinate the schedules is also phenonminal , we have a whiteboard at home to map out where everyone is during the week.



takes antidepressants and goes back to working on presentation for tomorrows early meeting whilst waiting for the washing to finish. its nearly midnight.
 
Yes, dimensions have gotten more deep and complex, and to add to that there's also these huge emotional factors, which, no offense, are less profound with men according to a lot of psychological research.

So, I guess we just have to try and cope with things, one way or the other?
 
Of course women are less happy, the pressure to perform so many roles is enormous

We put that pressure on ourselves for the most part...perfectionism and guilt are tendancies more prevalent among women than men.

Thankfully I decided long ago (around 9/11 actually) that I'd rather be happy than perfect!
 
We put that pressure on ourselves for the most part...perfectionism and guilt are tendancies more prevalent among women than men.

Hmm...that might explain my moments of unhappiness, although I am inclined to chalk it up to impatience, as well.
 
and to add to that there's also these huge emotional factors, which, no offense, are less profound with men according to a lot of psychological research.

Credible research? I'm no expert, but I'm going to fully disagree with that anyway. Emotional depth is no less profound among men, they just express it (or not) much differently than women do.
 
We put that pressure on ourselves for the most part...perfectionism and guilt are tendancies more prevalent among women than men.

Thankfully I decided long ago (around 9/11 actually) that I'd rather be happy than perfect!

oh yes i completely agree we put the pressure on ourselves, and women tear strips off other women and we judge ourselves more harshly than anyone else would .

is the perfectionism of women in the asthetic , created ,perpetuated and projected by men through beauty and fashion, porn,
and then carried on into the workplace and home and expected to be followed by women worse than the pressure of fullfilling multiple roles?
 
is the perfectionism of women in the asthetic , created ,perpetuated and projected by men through beauty and fashion, porn, and then carried on into the workplace and home and expected to be followed by women worse than the pressure of fullfilling multiple roles?

Ha, good question. You're got to think they're closely related though. When most women look in the mirror, they zero in on flaws - even those at the top of the beauty chain. When they multitask in multiple roles, they beat themselves up about what's not getting accomplished to perceived standards (which is partly wound up in changing gender roles).

Speaking of the asthetic, is it really driven by men?

If on the instinctual and biological level, beauty is about symmetry and the rest is cultural influence, what really drives Western perception of beauty?

In broad generalizations, women seek to attract men and men are status seekers.

Apparently, when it comes to consumer spending, women are the decision makers. Whatever we are sold as beauty in the marketplace is driven by demand.
 
Hmm...that might explain my moments of unhappiness, although I am inclined to chalk it up to impatience, as well.

Impatience, yes.

Overcoming my own impatience was (still is) very much a matter of separating what's within my control and what isn't. In my case, it wasn't until I had a couple of babies that I figured that out (purely out of self-preseravtion) and started applying it to the rest of my life.
 
Back
Top Bottom