I think that religions are man made, they are part of human culture and they work around how peoples minds work, there is no one true faith and there is no dilemma about different belief systems if, in the absence of definitive evidence, we view them in that light.
I think that life on earth is a combination of an initial biochemical reaction under the laws of physics followed by nearly 4 billion years of mechanical undirected (but not random) sorting producing remarkable diversity. This is not a faith based position, evidence of life on Earth goes back over 3 billion years, life does not require any special type of matter or energy and it doesn't disobey natural law. Pinning down the process of abiogenesis is the mystery here, once there is a replicating organic molecule with variation and differential survival then evolution will generate novel forms. Given the smallest/least complex molecule that can replicate with variation, the number of possible worlds this can take place, the number of places on those world where these types of molecules can be produced the origin of life in the universe becomes a question of probability, and we know that it worked out on at least one planet.
I think that the nature of the universe is an open question that religion ignored (by explaining everything from an initial answer/guess) one for which science has begun to scratch the surface.
There is no cause to suppose God when the big questions have better explanations and the mysterious unknowns only leave room for a deity so impotent or malicious that it is pointless to worship.
In principle I am open to the possibility that there is a God out there, but it would demand strong evidence, otherwise my position is indistinguishable from God in nature.
I find it interesting that people view theistic evolution as a good way of reconciling God and the real world, when the blind process of evolution is predicated upon rather harsh Malthusian principles. What entity would use 13.7 billion years, unfathomable quantities of energy, 99.999 ad infinitum percent of beings that ever existed just to bring humans into existence. A deity that relies on so much wastage, death and suffering to produce a single species seems unworthy of worship; and if God further divorced from human affairs as a first cause that set the laws of physics and the rest is emergent then the position is indistinguishable from an agnostic one.
This is not a dilemma in the absence of God, we can place our existence into a natural framework and do away with the need to justify events in relation to any God; we can still experience the pleasures and pains of existence, appreciate the beautiful, feel the spiritual, wonder about the mysterious and do all this without having to suspend our disbelief or accept absurdities.