Anti-Tax Tea Parties Held Across U.S. - Page 47 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-23-2012, 11:56 PM   #691
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Standing on the shore, facing east.
Posts: 18,866
Local Time: 11:49 AM
Obama is not going in the right direction (he is far too right wing), but the GOP would take us in an even worse direction.
__________________

__________________
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:43 AM   #692
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,474
Local Time: 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
the only way to slow down the building of McMansions around Washington, D.C.


weird, don't see anywhere in or around DC on this list:

The Richest Zip Codes In The United States [PHOTOS]
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 06:25 PM   #693
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
U2DMfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: It's Inside A Black Hole
Posts: 6,637
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
The exact opposite direction this administration is taking us.
And the Republicans will go in that exact same direction as well.
There is absolutely no impetus for them (either party) to do otherwise.
They want the status quo - which keeps them (individually) in power.
Those that are principled and honorable enough to stand against these sort of things are either rendered ineffective and sent home because of that or labeled by the establishment (on either side) as fringe-thinkers.

The more people realize that both sides are equally guilty, the better chances we have to fix it.

I wouldn't blame you, Indy, for saying "I'm with the Republicans because of issue X, Y or Z"...hell, we only have two choices. But to believe that the Republicans are any kind of alternative to corporatism is ludicrous.

We have growing deficits, Big Government, inability to raise revenues, all of it comes from the same place. They are afraid of losing their elected positions.

If they didn't give a shit about their re-elections, they'd do exactly what they are supposed to do. Cut as much as we can, raise some revenues, cut the deficit as close to '0' as possible, watch the economy grow, and see people returning to work.

Right now they all have plausible, political deniability.
"You see, it's the other side that's screwing you!"
We need to get more people to wise up. It's both parties fault, and we have to throw umbrella fixes over both of them at the same time, period.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlit_Angel View Post


Is there anything we can do to try and get the last part of your post to be a reality? Or is it a losing battle at this point?
Term limits, banning lobbyists in whatever way possible, real election reform, many things that NOBODY is talking about. Not Romney, not Gingrich, not Obama, not even Ron Paul, really.

The system has designed itself, through years of political strategy, into a two party corporatized monopoly. People as wide on the spectrum as Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan have been saying this for years. More and more people are seeing this as a reality, which is really the only antidote -people wising up to it. Neither party is a good alternative to THIS particular problem. They are both, precisely, the problem.

I'll have a detailed answer to your question later on when I have more time.
__________________
U2DMfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2012, 07:37 PM   #694
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 08:49 AM


Quote:
Mention the “99%” in my boss’ presence and feel his wrath. So proudly does he wear his 1% badge of honor that he tips exactly 1% every time he feels the server doesn’t sufficiently bow down to his Holiness. Oh, and he always makes sure to include a “tip” of his own.
Banker Leaves 1% Tip On $133 Lunch Bill In Defiance of 'The 99%' [UPDATED]
__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2012, 08:14 PM   #695
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,256
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
Term limits, banning lobbyists in whatever way possible, real election reform, many things that NOBODY is talking about. Not Romney, not Gingrich, not Obama, not even Ron Paul, really.

The system has designed itself, through years of political strategy, into a two party corporatized monopoly. People as wide on the spectrum as Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan have been saying this for years. More and more people are seeing this as a reality, which is really the only antidote -people wising up to it. Neither party is a good alternative to THIS particular problem. They are both, precisely, the problem.

I'll have a detailed answer to your question later on when I have more time.
Oh, absolutely, I agree with those ideas. I meant more is there anything we can do to try and get those ideas to become reality-I should've clarified that . How can we raise more awareness of these issues to where the candidates themselves HAVE to start talking about it?

I look forward to your detailed response when you have the time .
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2012, 03:48 PM   #696
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Canadiens1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,363
Local Time: 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
Crony capitalism 101. Republicans and Democrats are equally guilty and I agree, it has to be changed. Uniform tax codes, and lessening the governments' involvement in the economy is the only way to get corporations competing in the marketplace, rather than K street, with their dollars. the only way to slow down the building of McMansions around Washington, D.C.

The exact opposite direction this administration is taking us.
Regan and Clinton administration deregulation of the financial industry laid the groundwork for the financial crisis we currently find ourselves scrambling up the other side of. Saying we need less government regulation of everything across the board is ignoring the reality selfish human interest and greed.

I am all for simpler tax codes, of course, but the financial industry needs a leash considering the fact that, you know, they can break our economy by doing dumb shit.
__________________
Canadiens1131 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2012, 04:23 PM   #697
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
U2DMfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: It's Inside A Black Hole
Posts: 6,637
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlit_Angel View Post

I look forward to your detailed response when you have the time .
Every time I begin to post something, I retract it and start over. Turns out my 'detailed answers' were much more about the problem than the answer.

It's complicated, there are so many issues...I feel like I could type a thousand words on this. It's such a clusterfuck, that I feel each facet needs to be explained, rather than making statements as facts without justification. And yet...any solution that can reach the idiotic masses, needs to be able to be dumbed down into a very concise argument.

And that 'winnable' argument is that Republicans and Democrats don't care about the people anymore. They are more concerned with holding on to their elected office. I think you could get just about anyone to digest this, if it's done in the proper way.

So, to begin...I think the easiest way to getting real reform is a motivated non-partisan grassroots effort and for the media to pick up on it. If we could get the John King's and Brett Baer's of the world to start talking to candidates about it, we could at least start a public dialogue. One of the big stumbling blocks to it, is making sure that the movement itself isn't swallowed up into the hyper-partisan bullshit. Both the Occupy movement and the Tea Party had a more wide appeal than they were eventually tagged with...part of this is after the politicians get involved (and the super simple news media) most of the 'middle' crowd says 'fuck this' and doesn't want to be associated with ignorance (see: Occupy Oakland and certain elements of the Tea Party).

So the grassroots movement would have to be, from the jump, decidedly Independent. Conservative Independents, Libertarian Independents, Green Independents, Liberal Independents, Moderate Independents. All coalescing around one key issue. Returning the U.S. Government to true representative democracy.

Essentially, we're gonna have to bust up the Two Party Monopoly together. And this can only be done by totally disassociating with ALL Republicans and Democrats and considering them the enemy. You can be as conservative or liberal as you want, no ideological disagreements would matter. The main goal would be for petitions to circulate to get an Independent, from either side (more Liberal and more Conservative) on the national ballot.

The asshole news media, which spent more time on Whitney Houston in one week than it has EVER spent covering term limits or lobby reform, would follow the herd. All they care about is getting asses in front of televisions, or clicks on websites. And so we should use the media to form the grassroots and not the other way around. Otherwise, the grassroots would quickly skew ideological from ignorant radicals.

Now, this is going to sound ridiculous at first but hear me out. What does the media flock to quicker than anything else? You could get a B-level celebrity on MSNBC or FOX quicker than you could get just about anyone short of Obama. Because as Boner likes to say, celebrity is ridiculous but it is currency and they should spend it wisely. If we could get a couple of real A-listers like Boner, ideally a conservative and a liberal, to team up and start selling the message of ending Big 'sold out' Government, then maybe people would at least start talking about it. The only agenda being - REFORM of the SYSTEM. No issues with which to divide us, just about having our votes mean something and forcing Republicans and Democrats to be accountable, only, to the people.

I think it would need to resemble...as ironic as this sounds...a lobby.
A Grover Norquist-like pledge system. They either pledge to support term limits, lobby reform and election reform, or we find primary candidates that will and defeat them.

That's about the only way I can see it happening. There are a couple of others but they would be MUCH more difficult. And part of what I was writing earlier (before erasing it), explaining the problem, was why there are so very, very few plausible options.
__________________
U2DMfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 01:06 PM   #698
War Child
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 705
Local Time: 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadiens1131 View Post
Regan and Clinton administration deregulation of the financial industry laid the groundwork for the financial crisis we currently find ourselves scrambling up the other side of. Saying we need less government regulation of everything across the board is ignoring the reality selfish human interest and greed.
How do you explain the economic upswings during the Reagan and Clinton administrations then?


(My apologies for forgetting my American history.)
__________________
HBK-79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 02:33 PM   #699
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 56,370
Local Time: 11:49 AM
while i dislike the culture of assumed tipping, this guy should probably be fed to the wolves.
__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 03:43 PM   #700
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
U2DMfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: It's Inside A Black Hole
Posts: 6,637
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HBK-79 View Post
How do you explain the economic upswings during the Reagan and Clinton administrations then?
Business cycles probably.
But so much of it has to do with consumer confidence. I think Canadiens is right and as I'm sure he'd agree, those regulations also need to be reasonable. The problem is, the push back against any regulation from the Right is considerable. Makes it hard to protect consumers. At the same time, you don't want to handcuff the 1% of the people having the real money that bolsters the economy.

What we end up with is a bullshit partisan construction of No Regulations vs Unreasonable Regulations, so they (either side) can frame the political discourse into Us vs Them, precisely to keep the choice as A or B. While we all know that a comfortable compromise can and should be made.

I was a kid during the Reagan era (6-14) so my recall of the economic history is much more by cultural osmosis. In the Clinton era, I was 18-26, so I remember it well. If you look at the economy right after Windows 95 came out, then later Windows 98, you can explain it pretty well right there. That kick started what we call The Internet, even though it had existed prior to that. I got online first in 1997, it was a BOOM. We also had a balanced budget which gave investors the confidence to spend money like it was going out of style.

Of course the bullshit partisan construction in hindsight is that it was a Bubble, which was true, and that it was somehow a false notion of economic success.

The Reagan economy speaks highly for low taxation.
Uncomfortable truth for some. But again, I think most on the Left understand that it doesn't serve the interest of average consumers to be taxed to death.

Personally, I attribute most all economic success/growth/recovery to consumer confidence. If you have an extra $100, do you feel confident enough to go buy that new pair of shoes you want? Or do you feel like you need to save it for a rainy day? That confidence comes from, IMO, the average person looking at the ability of the government to handle their business. But it always helps to have new industry.

We need a competent, accountable Government and new industry in my view.

So to answer your question, I think the consistent thread to the economy in both the Clinton and Reagan era (note -Democrat and Republican control in both cases) was that people had confidence that shit wasn't going to fall off the cliff at any moment's notice. We had a lot of the same problems as we do now. All recent administrations played a part in what happened in 2008. And the recovery from what happened has been worsened by mistakes, hyper-partisanship and mostly the inevitable finally coming to fruition.
We have a lot of shit we don't know how to pay for. And that isn't unique to the Obama administration, it's just suddenly we've all agreed something had to finally be done. Which is unfair, but could actually serve Obama's benefit. His second term could be incredible...then again, it could also go the exact opposite.
__________________
U2DMfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 05:17 PM   #701
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,656
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HBK-79 View Post
How do you explain the economic upswings during the Reagan and Clinton administrations then?


(My apologies for forgetting my American history.)
I think what U2DMfan says above is true, but one other factor to take into consideration is that anytime you take away regulations you are going to get a TEMPORARY upswing. It only makes sense. Think about it, once you take away rules or guidelines a company, an individual, etc are going to cut corners as soon as they can. Cutting corners will lead to cheaper prices and/ or bigger profits. But this can only last for so long hence the bubbles.
__________________
BVS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012, 03:27 AM   #702
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 08:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headache in a Suitcase View Post
while i dislike the culture of assumed tipping, this guy should probably be fed to the wolves.
looks like it is fake

Sorry, The Restaurant Receipt Left By That Nasty, Rich Banker Is A Photoshop Hoax | The Smoking Gun
__________________
deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 01:18 AM   #703
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,256
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
Every time I begin to post something, I retract it and start over. Turns out my 'detailed answers' were much more about the problem than the answer.
*Nods* Totally understandable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
It's complicated, there are so many issues...I feel like I could type a thousand words on this. It's such a clusterfuck, that I feel each facet needs to be explained, rather than making statements as facts without justification. And yet...any solution that can reach the idiotic masses, needs to be able to be dumbed down into a very concise argument.
I know. It's frustrating. I don't want to make it seem like people are being talked down to, I'd like to promote the message in a way that makes it clear the population "gets it". To insult their intelligence would be a big turn-off right away.

However...put too much talk in that sounds like the sort you could only understand if you were part of that group to begin with, and you're liable to confuse people. There needs to be a balance-not so dumbed down that we imply everyone hearing the message is stupid, but not so high-minded that people will be scratching their heads. Which is easier said than done.

Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
And that 'winnable' argument is that Republicans and Democrats don't care about the people anymore. They are more concerned with holding on to their elected office. I think you could get just about anyone to digest this, if it's done in the proper way.
Most definitely. On board with that so far.

Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
So, to begin...I think the easiest way to getting real reform is a motivated non-partisan grassroots effort and for the media to pick up on it. If we could get the John King's and Brett Baer's of the world to start talking to candidates about it, we could at least start a public dialogue. One of the big stumbling blocks to it, is making sure that the movement itself isn't swallowed up into the hyper-partisan bullshit. Both the Occupy movement and the Tea Party had a more wide appeal than they were eventually tagged with...part of this is after the politicians get involved (and the super simple news media) most of the 'middle' crowd says 'fuck this' and doesn't want to be associated with ignorance (see: Occupy Oakland and certain elements of the Tea Party).
Lord, yes. The movement needs to be taken seriously. Maybe we should take our cues from protests of the past where people generally did behave reasonably-look at certain notable figures from the past who protested in non-violent ways and didn't get into weird costumes or other attention-seeking craziness and just got their message across simply, and emulate them? Show by example and spread the message in a way that shows that this is a movement that needs to be taken seriously and means something?

Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
So the grassroots movement would have to be, from the jump, decidedly Independent. Conservative Independents, Libertarian Independents, Green Independents, Liberal Independents, Moderate Independents. All coalescing around one key issue. Returning the U.S. Government to true representative democracy.

Essentially, we're gonna have to bust up the Two Party Monopoly together. And this can only be done by totally disassociating with ALL Republicans and Democrats and considering them the enemy. You can be as conservative or liberal as you want, no ideological disagreements would matter. The main goal would be for petitions to circulate to get an Independent, from either side (more Liberal and more Conservative) on the national ballot.
I like that idea. Lord knows there's many people who'd probably want to try running as independents, or party members who, once they see how popular the independent option is, would consider jumping onboard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
The asshole news media, which spent more time on Whitney Houston in one week than it has EVER spent covering term limits or lobby reform, would follow the herd. All they care about is getting asses in front of televisions, or clicks on websites. And so we should use the media to form the grassroots and not the other way around. Otherwise, the grassroots would quickly skew ideological from ignorant radicals.

Now, this is going to sound ridiculous at first but hear me out. What does the media flock to quicker than anything else? You could get a B-level celebrity on MSNBC or FOX quicker than you could get just about anyone short of Obama. Because as Boner likes to say, celebrity is ridiculous but it is currency and they should spend it wisely. If we could get a couple of real A-listers like Boner, ideally a conservative and a liberal, to team up and start selling the message of ending Big 'sold out' Government, then maybe people would at least start talking about it. The only agenda being - REFORM of the SYSTEM. No issues with which to divide us, just about having our votes mean something and forcing Republicans and Democrats to be accountable, only, to the people.
I know. Unfortunately it would take a big notable name, because if the movement is well-behaved and doesn't get into wacky "check this out" territory the media's going to find it boring and try and drum up excitement some other way. But hey, whatever helps. And no matter who it is, it needs to be someone who knows a lot about this subject (and doesn't have any hypocrisy about the issue or ties to anything, but just honestly believes in the topic at hand). If it's just your average celebrity spouting BS, that's not going to help.

Quote:
Originally Posted by U2DMfan View Post
I think it would need to resemble...as ironic as this sounds...a lobby.
A Grover Norquist-like pledge system. They either pledge to support term limits, lobby reform and election reform, or we find primary candidates that will and defeat them.

That's about the only way I can see it happening. There are a couple of others but they would be MUCH more difficult. And part of what I was writing earlier (before erasing it), explaining the problem, was why there are so very, very few plausible options.
Fight fire with fire, huh ? I'd say that would mean it could look and sound like a lobby without all the downsides of one, but that still sounds like it's the start of something shady . But I do firmly believe that nothing terrifies the politicians more than an angry populace and the real threat of losing their jobs, so if this "lobby" of sorts manages to get that message across in a very notable way, it'll be a great start.

If that's our easiest option I fear to think of what you figure would be more difficult! That's why I wanted to know if there was any shot at even trying to get change, because it seems at this point we're so firmly entrenched in the situation we're in now that it almost seems hopeless to try. But I'm an optimist, so I like to think there's still hope. I think your idea is a fantastic one and in the technological age we live in I see no reason why it can't spread like wildfire. I think many people would be willing to jump onboard with the topics put forward-even if you aren't a political person by nature you have a general idea of what term limits and reform mean, and usually people are okay with that in some form or another.

I just fear it being a great idea that quickly descends into the same chaos we see all the time with protests nowadays. And humans being what they are, ESPECIALLY on the internet, that seems a very real possiblity.

But if anyone is willing to give this a shot, I say we try and get started anyway.
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 02:32 AM   #704
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
U2DMfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: It's Inside A Black Hole
Posts: 6,637
Local Time: 10:49 AM
The moral to the story is, the change has to come from us. And we have to enlighten ourselves collectively, that neither the Democrats nor Republicans are a good option, no matter how ideologically conservative or liberal you are. I just think we could use leadership in that movement. And nothing sells better than famous faces.

I might post an alternative option soon.
__________________
U2DMfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 08:09 PM   #705
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Exclusive - The Vetting - Barack Obama, the First Tea Partier



Quote:
In 2009, President Barack Obama reportedly called members of the Tea Party "teabaggers." It turns out that our fourth greatest president, first in so many things, may have been the first "teabagger" himself, as seen in the 1997 photograph above. Yes, that really is Barack Obama wearing a regimental coat and carrying a tricorn hat in his hand. And that flag behind him really is a Gadsden flag, with its serpent and its "Don't Tread On Me" slogan. You may want to let all of this sink in a bit, especially if you're a Tea Party-bashing progressive.
Barack slow jammin' the Tea Party.
__________________

__________________
INDY500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com