American Way of Birth, Costliest in the World - Page 4 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-03-2013, 04:10 PM   #46
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 07:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
How about ANY kind of overhaul.

I am a conservative, and I think that health care is basic human right. It goes right to core of our national values of Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness.

My desire to "heal" every human being on US soil (well, the entire world - but we are talking about the US for now) as much a possible stems from my faith, which motivates me to love, which works through modern technology and medicine (as well as prayer, of course).

Health care is not, and never should be, considered a business enterprise.

The good news is that as technology improves - I believe you will see a return of the house doctor and small local clinics to treat the minor aches and pains at a very low cost. Hopefully the more expensive items will come down the same way IT costs have come down (price per performance cost).
If only all Christian Conservatives would follow this lead. Nicely put, man
__________________

__________________
Jive Turkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 04:42 PM   #47
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,653
Local Time: 08:15 AM
I just want to say, it's really great to see FYM be active again in a way it used to be a long time ago. Old faces, same faces - we're all having great discussions, finding some common ground and having healthy debates. FYM as it should be!
__________________

__________________
Pearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 05:17 PM   #48
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,234
Local Time: 06:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl View Post
I just want to say, it's really great to see FYM be active again in a way it used to be a long time ago. Old faces, same faces - we're all having great discussions, finding some common ground and having healthy debates. FYM as it should be!
Seconded.
__________________
Diemen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 05:54 PM   #49
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 05:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jive Turkey View Post
If only all Christian Conservatives would follow this lead. Nicely put, man
Thanks, Jive.

Yes - I find it confusing that the so many Christians are against universal healthcare when the modern hospital system was invented by the Church for Pete's sake!

At some point in time - greed took over and now we have this wonderful mess. But at it's heart, healthcare is about charity for our brothers and sisters that fall sick.

Perhaps everyone should get together and bypass the government - and fund hospitals through our own giving, make it a true non-profit; also knowing that one day we will all be on the receiving end of that charity.

The current quasi-regulated-maximize-profit system is simply a crime.
__________________
AEON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 05:58 PM   #50
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,428
Local Time: 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post

Thanks, Jive.

Yes - I find it confusing that the so many Christians are against universal healthcare when the modern hospital system was invented by the Church for Pete's sake!

At some point in time - greed took over and now we have this wonderful mess. But at it's heart, healthcare is about charity for our brothers and sisters that fall sick.

Perhaps everyone should get together and bypass the government - and fund hospitals through our own giving, make it a true non-profit; also knowing that one day we will all be on the receiving end of that charity.

The current quasi-regulated-maximize-profit system is simply a crime.
__________________
nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 05:59 PM   #51
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
jeevey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rue St. Divine
Posts: 4,095
Local Time: 08:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maycocksean View Post
In my opinion nationalized health care, yes, the dreaded "socialized medicine" is the best bet.

But of course it'll never happen.

Maybe if it was socialized at the state level, it might have a chance?

But I doubt it.
I think we actually would have stood a better chance of getting there if the ACA had not passed.
__________________
jeevey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 08:33 PM   #52
Acrobat
 
Badyouken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 487
Local Time: 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbcrusader View Post
The healthcare equivalent of police and fire services is the Center for Disease Control (CDC). The CDC, coupled with mandatory vaccination programs, protects society as a whole where it would be difficult, if not impossible, to protect oneself.
That is pretty thin, and I think you know it. Fire services protect society as a whole, yes, but also individuals in the event of disaster. Why should society pay to help one individual as their house burns down, but not as their liver fails? Society is simply a gathering of individuals.

From what I gather, there are some procedures that you do not see fit for a public healthcare system. That's fine (and a totally different debate), but it does not mean that the entire system should be thrown out the window.
__________________
Badyouken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 08:35 PM   #53
Acrobat
 
Badyouken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 487
Local Time: 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
Yes - I find it confusing that the so many Christians are against universal healthcare when the modern hospital system was invented by the Church for Pete's sake!

At some point in time - greed took over and now we have this wonderful mess. But at it's heart, healthcare is about charity for our brothers and sisters that fall sick.

Perhaps everyone should get together and bypass the government - and fund hospitals through our own giving, make it a true non-profit; also knowing that one day we will all be on the receiving end of that charity.

The current quasi-regulated-maximize-profit system is simply a crime.


Frankly, any other stance from an avowed Christian is simply incoherent.
__________________
Badyouken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 08:45 PM   #54
Acrobat
 
Badyouken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 487
Local Time: 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeevey View Post
I think we actually would have stood a better chance of getting there if the ACA had not passed.
That is quite possible. It would have been much more elegant - but politically charged - to propose to extend Medicare to all. "Medicare for All" has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?
__________________
Badyouken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 09:40 PM   #55
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
jeevey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rue St. Divine
Posts: 4,095
Local Time: 08:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badyouken View Post
That is pretty thin, and I think you know it.
Yes. A better comparison may have been to compare the CDC to the FBI as a national service. They gather and aggregate information, they have really great research techniques, they keep track of national trends and they ride into town when there's a crisis, but they don't actually provide much in the way of direct care. The FBI is not in any way a substitution for local law enforcement, and the CDC has very little to do with actual health care that's delivered to sick people.
__________________
jeevey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 12:05 AM   #56
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,428
Local Time: 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl View Post
I just want to say, it's really great to see FYM be active again in a way it used to be a long time ago. Old faces, same faces - we're all having great discussions, finding some common ground and having healthy debates. FYM as it should be!
Agreed. Despite the disparity of our political predilections, it's certainly been a week of robust discussion. (It almost makes up for the lack of any new album news. Almost.)
__________________
nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 01:09 AM   #57
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 04:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badyouken View Post
That is pretty thin, and I think you know it. Fire services protect society as a whole, yes, but also individuals in the event of disaster. Why should society pay to help one individual as their house burns down, but not as their liver fails? Society is simply a gathering of individuals.
The question was: police and fire are "socialized" services, shouldn't healthcare be fully socialized as well. I tried to point out it was apples to oranges, not suggest the CDC should function as our healthcare system. I would reject the notion that “if government provides (a), then it should provide (b), (c) and (d).

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeevey View Post
To be clear, people who favor national health care do not consider the Affordable Care act to be a solution to all our problems. To my mind it's a rather half-assed fix that fails to address the real problems that make American medicine so expensive. It's better than before, but not great. I doubt America will ever have the balls to do a European style overhaul.
To the contrary, the ACA is poorly written legislation (apparently, not worth even reading before Congress voted on the law), that enlarges an already broken system.
The US had a long standing system of true healthcare insurance. As the government continued to pass mandates, the insurance morphed into coverage. With every mandate, the costs increased. Just about every core promise regarding the ACA has proven to be false. Costs will soar, the scope of coverage will not go as far as promised, and the quality of healthcare will decline.
A European-style overhaul would require answering some basic, tough questions.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 01:13 AM   #58
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,882
Local Time: 07:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeevey View Post
I think we actually would have stood a better chance of getting there if the ACA had not passed.
Yeah, the ACA is kind of like the DOMA of health care reform.
__________________
maycocksean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 01:14 AM   #59
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,882
Local Time: 07:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbcrusader View Post
The US had a long standing system of true healthcare insurance. As the government continued to pass mandates, the insurance morphed into coverage.
I'm not familiar with this. Could you elaborate?
__________________
maycocksean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 02:19 AM   #60
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,471
Local Time: 07:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbcrusader View Post
The question was: police and fire are "socialized" services, shouldn't healthcare be fully socialized as well. I tried to point out it was apples to oranges, not suggest the CDC should function as our healthcare system. I would reject the notion that “if government provides (a), then it should provide (b), (c) and (d).

No you didn't. You set up an entirely false analogy and were called out on it.



Quote:
To the contrary, the ACA is poorly written legislation (apparently, not worth even reading before Congress voted on the law), that enlarges an already broken system.
The US had a long standing system of true healthcare insurance. As the government continued to pass mandates, the insurance morphed into coverage. With every mandate, the costs increased. Just about every core promise regarding the ACA has proven to be false. Costs will soar, the scope of coverage will not go as far as promised, and the quality of healthcare will decline.
A European-style overhaul would require answering some basic, tough questions.


Seems CA has had a different experience than the horrors you describe, where insurers expect to chat significantly lower than expected premiums.

GOP run states can refuse to set up exchanges and expand Medicare all they want, their own citizens will suffer so they can be used as "examples" of a supposed failure -- meanwhile states like CA, and MA, will enjoy full medical coverage and the declining costs associated with a citizenry 100% insured.
__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com