"All the world will denounce the SONY." - Page 4 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-18-2014, 09:23 PM   #46
Blue Crack Addict
 
MissVelvetDress_75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: basking in my post-concert glow still mesmerized by the orbit of his hips..Also Holding Bono Close as he requested.
Posts: 25,776
Local Time: 03:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post

What kind of dirt do the hackers have on Sony? Would it really be surprising to learn that people involved in making movies are giant assholes? Possibly with some misogyny, racism and puppy kicking?

I was talking to a coworker about this this morning. I too want to know how much more damning stuff they have on The Sony.



Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
__________________

__________________
MissVelvetDress_75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2014, 09:47 PM   #47
The Fly
 
Cancer45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 269
Local Time: 03:08 AM
I thought this was interesting


https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...internet.shtml
__________________

__________________
Cancer45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2014, 10:33 PM   #48
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,498
Local Time: 03:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earnie Shavers View Post
Wrong on all counts


What's your take? Genuinely curious.

And, guys, Newt Gingrich thinks this is an act of war. I'm glad we're getting his critical opinion on this.


Sent from
__________________
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 04:48 AM   #49
Refugee
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,435
Local Time: 08:08 AM
George Clooney has a VERY interesting take on all this, you can read his interview on Nikki Finke's site, Deadline Hollywood.
Deadline | Hollywood Entertainment Breaking News

The article is called "Hollywood Cowardice"

Regardless of whether you're a Clooney fan or not--and I confess I'm generally meh--my respect for him just shot up leaps and bounds. He's the only one in Tinseltown (or the media, for that matter) who seems to grasp the profoundly frightening implications of what just happened here. The questions he raises are of the huge importance and nobody is asking them right now. Worth a read.

Interesting tidbit from the article: When Nixon went to China, he was asked why the US supported South Korea, and he said it was because we (America) were the guardians of peace.
Think about that.
I mean, really think about that.
And wonder why the White House has responded the way it has so far, and why it is pledging a continued limited response. They must know more than they are willing admit, about who did this.
__________________
Teta040 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 07:37 AM   #50
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London/Sydney
Posts: 6,608
Local Time: 09:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
What's your take? Genuinely curious.

They had absolutely no choice in regards to pulling it from theatres, and the current 'no release anywhere' (digital, subscription, DVD etc) suggestion I would say is still actually TBC, for a couple of reasons. It's really not Sony 'bowing to terrorists'. Yet.
__________________
Earnie Shavers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 12:12 PM   #51
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Mrs. Garrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: pig farming in Bolivia
Posts: 7,220
Local Time: 02:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headache in a Suitcase View Post
There's no way this movie was pulled because anyone thought there was a real threat to movie goers.

The movie was pulled because the publicity and interest had reached such a level that Sony couldn't have possibly released this piece of garbage, especially when the theaters started backing out.

Now they'll release it on demand, many will go rent it, and they'll make millions off this sheer pile of donkey crap they call a movie.
Word on the street is that Sony will not release it period, under any format, and will claim this as a "total loss" for insurance purposes.

If/when that happens, the movie would supposedly be property of the insurance company, who in turn, could potentially release this in some form if they wanted to recoup whatever would be potentially be paid to Sony.

Had Sony allowed this to be released "On Demand" or streaming only, then it would not be a total loss and they couldn't get as much from an insurance claim.
__________________
Mrs. Garrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 01:31 PM   #52
Blue Crack Distributor
 
bono_212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 81,105
Local Time: 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teta040 View Post
George Clooney has a VERY interesting take on all this, you can read his interview on Nikki Finke's site, Deadline Hollywood.
Deadline | Hollywood Entertainment Breaking News

The article is called "Hollywood Cowardice"

Regardless of whether you're a Clooney fan or not--and I confess I'm generally meh--my respect for him just shot up leaps and bounds. He's the only one in Tinseltown (or the media, for that matter) who seems to grasp the profoundly frightening implications of what just happened here. The questions he raises are of the huge importance and nobody is asking them right now. Worth a read.

Interesting tidbit from the article: When Nixon went to China, he was asked why the US supported South Korea, and he said it was because we (America) were the guardians of peace.
Think about that.
I mean, really think about that.
And wonder why the White House has responded the way it has so far, and why it is pledging a continued limited response. They must know more than they are willing admit, about who did this.
Link wasn't working for me, but here you go:

Hollywood Cowardice: George Clooney Explains Why Sony Stood Alone In North Korean Cyberterror Attack | Deadline
__________________
bono_212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 02:54 PM   #53
Blue Crack Distributor
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 63,730
Local Time: 12:08 AM
Was reading a comment string on Gawker about how perhaps the decision came from Sony in Japan (i.e., the poppermost of the toppermost). That would be interesting and could change the narrative quite a bit here. Japan's relation to NK is different than ours.

Thoughts?
__________________
corianderstem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 03:00 PM   #54
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London/Sydney
Posts: 6,608
Local Time: 09:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
Was reading a comment string on Gawker about how perhaps the decision came from Sony in Japan (i.e., the poppermost of the toppermost). That would be interesting and could change the narrative quite a bit here. Japan's relation to NK is different than ours.

Thoughts?

Combo of this + Mrs Garrison above, but still some TBC there.
__________________
Earnie Shavers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 08:21 PM   #55
Blue Crack Addict
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: illegitimi non carborundum
Posts: 17,410
Local Time: 03:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
(i.e., the poppermost of the toppermost).
__________________
DaveC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 08:22 PM   #56
Blue Crack Addict
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: illegitimi non carborundum
Posts: 17,410
Local Time: 03:08 AM
Well, the terrorists/hackers were right, the world is indeed denouncing "the SONY".
__________________
DaveC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 08:31 PM   #57
The Male
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollywoo
Posts: 65,809
Local Time: 12:08 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...-gop/20635449/

We don't negotiate with terrorists.
__________________


Now.
LemonMelon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2014, 10:41 PM   #58
The Fly
 
AllIWantIs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 84
Local Time: 01:08 AM
President Obama seems to be a James Flacco fan.
I have no idea who that is.
Obama Says 'James Flacco.' The Internet Says, Thank You : The Two-Way : NPR
__________________
AllIWantIs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2014, 10:55 AM   #59
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
Mrs. Garrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: pig farming in Bolivia
Posts: 7,220
Local Time: 02:08 AM
Quote:
Obama said he was sympathetic to the damage and threats Sony has dealt with. " "Having said all that, yes I think they made a mistake," Obama said.

"We cannot have a society in which some dictator someplace can start imposing censorship here in the United States," he said. "Because if somebody is able to intimidate folks out of releasing a satirical movie, imagine what they start doing when they see a documentary that they don't like or news reports that they don't like."

Even worse, Obama said, "imagine if producers and distributors and others started engaging in self-censorship because they don't want to offend the sensibilities of somebody whose sensibilities probably need to be offended."

"That's not who we are. That's not what America's about," he said.
Agreed, except, whatever happened to those pictures of Bin Laden with a bullet in his head, brah?
__________________
Mrs. Garrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2014, 02:27 PM   #60
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London/Sydney
Posts: 6,608
Local Time: 09:08 AM
Obama overall is obviously completely right, but not about the studios position, which is pretty silly, including saying 'they should have talked to me', when before he gave that opinion perhaps someone should have talked to them. Again (as Sony Pictures chief Michael Lynton has been out and about making clear since Obama's press conference) the decision on how/when with the film has not been made, it was only pulled from the Dec 25 theatrical release because... there effectively wasn't one, and that wasn't their decision.

The studio still badly wants to get it out *somehow*, even if many/most possible distribution partners are shaky on it, and even if Tokyo really, really just wants it all to go away, and really just wants to claw back whatever cash they can. That - from the studio - has been consistent, and doing so will likely mean further significant financial loss and either more trouble or embarrassment via more stuff being leaked. It's the opposite of 'giving in'. Hopefully it works out.
__________________

__________________
Earnie Shavers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com