Peterrrrr
New Yorker
if they changed strategy and just send the new single(when its ready) to the radio stations without warning, that would shock everybody... Instead of preparing that the new singles name is, and is going to be played...
ponkine said:U2 would never have the balls to do like Radiohead.
Headache in a Suitcase said:nor do they want to be like radiohead. nor should they want to be like radiohead. i think they've done ok for themselves being like u2.
the tourist said:
Radiohead allowed the downloader to specify a price. But they didn't have to. They could have just put a price tag on it and that's that. That is something U2 wouldn't do, of course.
U2girl said:
There was also the same album available later in CD format, and a special 80 dollar set (2 LPs, extra material).
ponkine said:U2 would never have the balls to do like Radiohead.
ponkine said:
There's nothing like being the first one on something. Hands down Radiohead.
Hibbyface said:
Were they the first artists do this?
Hibbyface said:
Were they the first artists do this?
Don't be mean, you gangsterrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrSicy said:Just curious, do you ever proof read your threads before you post them?
/Just curious
Headache in a Suitcase said:all it did was cost them a few million bucks.
LemonMelon said:
Hmm? Radiohead themselves stated that they made a larger net profit from In Rainbows than all of their other albums combined.