U2's eagerness to write an album full of joyful songs will eventually be their undoing.
the only way this album has any chance of being considered one of u2's best is if it has some sort of darkness or sexiness somewhere in the songs. this is what has been lacking in the last two albums especially.
it is true that darkness/sexiness doesn't always translate as well live, but it is essential to any album which hopes to have longevity. the songs that have choruses that an entire stadium can sing along to are great, but they do not always hold up as well on an album. u2 need to get personal again, they've conquered stadiums, they don't need to aim for that anymore. i think their eagerness since pop to write albums that translate well live has been their downfall in the studio.
the only way this album has any chance of being considered one of u2's best is if it has some sort of darkness or sexiness somewhere in the songs. this is what has been lacking in the last two albums especially.
it is true that darkness/sexiness doesn't always translate as well live, but it is essential to any album which hopes to have longevity. the songs that have choruses that an entire stadium can sing along to are great, but they do not always hold up as well on an album. u2 need to get personal again, they've conquered stadiums, they don't need to aim for that anymore. i think their eagerness since pop to write albums that translate well live has been their downfall in the studio.