Not sure. I think this might be the first U2 album where I don't know what to make of it/where I'd rank it.
It's a mix of okay forced "radio tunes" (first four songs except great pop of California), potentially great U2 (Iris), guitars-heavy Volcano-Cedarwood stretch (Volcano current favourite with California and Iris) and the last three songs don't do much for me at all.
Those big choruses in EBW and Song for Someone ? The background whoahoah vocals in Miracle ? The slick pop of California ? The slick production ?
Yeah...radio airplay written trying too hard all over it. Instead of genuinely trying a new sound, they opted for a slick, synth based pop sound bent on competing with the charts.
Those big choruses in EBW and Song for Someone ? The whoahoah vocals in Miracle ? The slick pop of California ? The smooth production ?
Yeah...radio airplay / trying too hard written all over it. Instead of genuinely trying a new sound, they opted for a slick, synth based pop sound bent on competing with the charts.
Yeah. Songs like 'Song for Someone' may be safe, but not forced.Forced? nothing on this album sounds forced at all imo
Those big choruses in EBW and Song for Someone ? The whoahoah vocals in Miracle ? The slick pop of California ? The smooth production ?
Yeah...radio airplay / trying too hard written all over it. Instead of genuinely trying a new sound, they opted for a slick, synth based pop sound bent on competing with the charts.
Not sure. I think this might be the first U2 album where I don't know what to make of it/where I'd rank it.
It's a mix of okay forced "radio tunes" (first four songs except great pop of California), potentially great U2 (Iris), guitars-heavy Volcano-Cedarwood stretch (Volcano current favourite with California and Iris) and the last three songs don't do much for me at all.
I think the album's pretty good once you accept it on its own terms. That is, yes, it is blatantly a shameless pursuit of a hit song. This is actually the most front-loaded album of their entire career. The first 6 songs. If Miracle fails, that's ok we have EBW, if that fails, hey maybe California, if that fails we got Song for Someone, Iris, Volcano....you see the pattern. From Raised by Wolves on there seems to be a different album taking place, one that feels more like the concept they talked this up to be, although I don't see how Sleep Like A Baby (although my favorite here) fits into the story of U2 as young lads. And ironically, the final song The Troubles sounds more like an actual hit than half of that first side, but i'm sure they see it as one of the "experimental" tracks.
Anyone who doesn't think U2 are desperately trying for a hit single hasn't been listening to the radio for 5 years. They have never gone so full throttle towards mainstream radio in their entire career.
Thing is, though, I kinda like that they're actually being shameless about it! I'd rather have a glossy pop song than a neutered rock song any day, which is why The Miracle, with its self-indulgent buzzkill of a chorus, has become my least fave and something like Iris, has slowly won me over with it's ecstasy-fueled dance floor vibe. I don't think they can make good rock singles anymore. If I could tell them anything, it would be to stick with songs like Sleep Like A Baby and The Troubles. Slower, sexier, more melancholy stuff. That's where I think their strengths lie now. It's why MOS was the best song on NLOTH.
But in my vision, I wished they had explored more in the "White As Snow" vein - not necessarily 11 slow paced, acoustic, mediative, folkey tracks, but I mean, that kind of technique and landscapes.
White as snow is a nice song but for many people it's a snooze. U2 is an old band and haven't done a record since early 2009. They need a shot of adrenaline in the arm. U2 has a huge back catalog so I think we can do with an album that has less of them. Songs of experience might have more of what you're looking for. Cedarwood road has plenty of introspection and landscapes that evokes a location really well.
I pretty much agree with this. I'd only say that I'm not a fan of the new album. And it's not because it's "pop" or because it has hits, because there's nothing wrong with it at all. Also not because it's hit-oriented. There are a lot of massive hits out there that are great pop/rock songs. In my opinion is the "trying too hard" in some songs. But most of all the production in some tracks, the influences in others, the vibe (or lack of it) in others.
I also agree with you in the description of some tracks. For instance, the reason I liked "Iris". "Iris" takes me a lot to some recent dancey-pop-rock tracks (some made by pop acts, others by more alternative acts that "just happened" to have a hit single) that are hits in some european markets, specially in France/Belgium. "Iris" reminded me for instance of a couple of tracks of french artist Julian Doré.
The same applies to "The Troubles". This song is not in my Top 3 (it lacks a something extra - something's missing there, the fade out is terrible, etc) but, again, it could also be a hit in some european markets, because this song-format sometimes happens to be popular here.
You mentioned the "Moment Of Surrender" feel of "The Troubles". It's easy to see the similarities. And I like "Moment Of Surrender". But in my vision, I wished they had explored more in the "White As Snow" vein - not necessarily 11 slow paced, acoustic, mediative, folkey tracks, but I mean, that kind of technique and landscapes.