shaun vox
New Yorker
DUH
its supposed to be funny with some truth.
but ya.
everyone needs to lighten up and have a laugh.
its supposed to be funny with some truth.
but ya.
everyone needs to lighten up and have a laugh.
...in your opinion.You can like any album you want because music is subjective. However, it should be clear to everyone that the band isn't up to the standard they were from 1984-1995. Musically and lyrically they aren't there anymore.
No. When people share your opinion they'll reach the same conclusion as you have.That's not what I said. I have subjective tastes but when I and most people look at the band objectively they'll reach the same conclusion as I have.
Read: More people need to share my opinion.That's the problem with the musical parts of the forum. People need to be more objective.
You can't make a factual conclusion on whether an album/band/era is good or not. It's all opinion. It can't be proven to another person with an objective mindset.You aren't understanding me. When you are objective and make an analysis it isn't an opinion it is a factual conclusion. The difference is that it can be proven to another person with an objective mindset.
Again, that's your opinion. Not fact.It isn't the sound of the band anymore. I'll give you Velvet Dress but not the others. They have gone away from their thing. The problem is you are still being subjective. Objectively you can see a complete shift from them being "them".
...in your opinion.Have you heard a word I've said? It isn't my opinion. It is a factual observation based on objectivity. It is them because that is who they are. That is their mark.
Based on objectivity, or was that your opinion. I'm confused.Calm down. I'm not trying to guilt anyone. I was just stating a fact for Sicy.
U2 have been around longer then a lot of people on this board have been alive, and been very sucessful finacially and artistically even in their "failures". One thing I will say is this, if U2 thinks this is their best album they should probably call it a career because in the end I feel the band are the ones that need to be impressed and not necessarly the fans of the band.
Coldplay is going to try to get a second album out this year?
U2 doesnt have anything to prove to the fans, they only have something to prove to themselves, and if this is the album theyve always wanted to make and feel they cant do any better, they should call it quits.
FACT: I love POP.
Beat that.
/argument
Sicy. I know you've probably heard this question, but are those your cats, and are they with earplugs because of your constant U2 listening?
I try to avoid listening to U2 before any release of new material. They aren't the same band they used to be and they are way past their prime so hearing older stuff would create impossible expectations.
Well, I guess I'll attempt to steer this thread back on to course.
How to deal with new album expectations?
The answer: I don't. Simple as that. I pay no attention to what anyone says about the new album and just listen to it and take it all in. I keep an open mind and a shut mouth. Works every time.
I still don't see why anyone would have to deal with album expectations
if it bothers you I'd advise you just not to visit U2 forums
until the single hits the radio you probably will hear near to nothing about it all