Deciphering Yesterdays News...(What It Really Means)

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

bono_man2002

Blue Crack Addict
Joined
Jul 4, 2002
Messages
28,506
Location
In the wrong band
U2.com | Official News
deciphering
192.13.43.12 | Official News On Our Site That Is Never Going To Change Our Layout From The 'Bomb' Era - Bringing you Live updates from the Boy Tour

'We want 2009 to be our year'

'We're still stuck in our 80's release methods , and still don't know about this iTunes program. Plus we still need time to ruin what could be a currently great record, but it needs to be over produced.

'We’ve hit a rich songwriting vein and we don’t want to stop.' Bono has been talking to U2.Com about how the songs are shaping up for the new record and plans for 2009 to be their year.

We've hit a rich songwriting vein, and we don't want to stop. Its taken us 4 years to get 5 songs down pat.

‘This is our chance for us to defy gravity once again, ‘ explains Bono, calling in from a break in recording sessions in the south of France. ‘ We have what it takes, we have the songs, new rhythms and a guitar player who is not ready to re-enter earth's atmosphere until he's taken a slice of the moon!
'It's been fun, it's been maddening... there have been injuries and recoveries, no babies born that I know of, but this one is nearly ready for the new year of 2009.'

"With a new album release, its a chance for me to talk crap again" 'explains Bono, calling in from a six month break in recording sessions in the south of France. "We have what it takes, we just don't have enough songs, our rhythms are the same as the previous album, and a guitar player who hasn't rocked this hard since All That You Can't Leave Behind"

"It hasn't been that fun, its been maddening......there have been injuries (thanks larry) and I've cried like a baby, and I'm still recovering. "But this album, will be ready for the new millennium"

The band have been writing and recording the follow-up to ‘How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb’ since last year, and the feeling is that they’ve hit a creative groove so there are no plans to stop. Everyone, he says, is excited about where the recording is taking them.

The band have been writing and recording the follow-up to ‘How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb’ since the last Ice Age, and the feeling is that they’ve hit a creative groove and there are plans to stop. Everyone, he says, is excited about where the recording is taking them. "We Just can't be bothered finishing it."

‘When we set out on this record it was Larry who came up with the plan not to have a plan. He put up this idea that wouldn’t it be great just to make music for its own sake, not for the purpose of a live show or on album but just to see what we’re capable of…’

‘When we set out on this record it was Larry who came up with the plan not to have actually release a record this century. He put up this idea that wouldn’t it be great just to make music for its own sake, not for the purpose of actually releasing it to fans

It’s an idea that’s paid off. Following sessions in Morocco, in Dublin and through the summer in France, the band have written ‘fifty or sixty’ tracks. And counting.

It’s an idea that’s paid off. Following sessions in Morocco, in Dublin and through the summer in France, the band have written ‘fifty or sixty’ tracks. And counting. "But then we realised they were mostly made up of covers or our older songs, and some were only words "kneel" "soul" and "Heart"


‘We’ve hit a rich songwriting vein,’ he explains. ‘It gets a bit dark down here but looks like we've found diamonds not coal. I thought a while back we might have the album wrapped by now, but why come up above ground now if there's more priceless stuff to be found?

‘We’ve hit a rich songwriting vein,’ he explains. ‘It gets a bit dark down here, and I'm scared of the dark, but we've found what looks like lots of coal, which is good, because I have a fire place...errr where were we? I thought a while back we might had Ali's Christmas present wrapped by now, but why now if there's more priceless stuff to be found?

For now, they’re keeping a promise they made to themselves when they started writing: ‘We said to each other that if we got to the great place then we wouldn’t stop…’

For now, they’re keeping a promise they made to themselves when they started writing: ‘We said to each other that if we got to the great place then we wouldn’t stop…and we still haven't found...wait....we still haven't found what we're looking for....Edge, write that down’

So the writing and recording continues and while they now know what shape most of the album will take, they're not leaving the studio just yet.

So the writing and recording continues and while they now know what shape most of the album will take, they're not leaving the studio just yet. Meanwhile Back at The U2 Studio, everything remains quiet empty.

‘We know we have to emerge soon but we also know that people don’t want another U2 album unless it is our best ever album. It has to be our most innovative, our most challenging … or what’s the point ?’

‘We know we have to emerge soon but we also know that people don’t want another crap U2 album. So what’s the point ?’ We're only going to put out a crap record anyway.'

They have no doubts that it will be as important a release for U2 as any. ‘It’s a brand new chapter for us, and everyone we’ve played the tracks to has said that musically it feels like another departure.

They have no doubts that it will be as important a release for U2 as any. ‘It’s a brand new chapter for us, and everyone we’ve played the tracks to has said that musically it feels like another departure, so we've sacked Larry.

‘The last two records were very personal, with a kind of three piece at their heart, the primary colours of rock - bass, guitars and drum. But what we’re about now is of the same order as the transition that took us from The Joshua Tree to Achtung Baby.’

‘The last two records were very disappointing personally, with a kind of old mans heart, like the faint beating of a drum But what we’re about now is of the same order as the transition that took us from All That You Can't Leave Behind to How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb, We would also like to issue this to our fans Out Album Titles Will Be Getting Longer

He also mentions that the recording in Morocco was the first time the band have worked in a studio open to the sky: ‘On that track you can hear the sound of a swallows nest close to the building - it’s beautiful.’

He also mentions that the recording with Maracas, was the first time the band have worked with Maracas in open air: ‘On that track you can hear the sound of a Adam swallowing a sandwich in the room next to the studio - it’s beautiful.’

Longtime collaborators Danny Lanois and Brian Eno have joined the band at different times, and, more recently, Steve Lillywhite – usually a tell-tale sign that a record is nearly done. ‘Steve has that ear for a top line melody and a good hook.’

Longtime collaborators Danny Lanois and Brian Eno have joined the band at different times, and, more recently, Steve Lillywhite – usually a tell-tale sign that a record is going to sound exactly the same as the last one. ‘Steve has that ear for a top line melody and a good hook.’

But while Bono is itching to get the music out he says it’s going to be early 2009 when we first get to hear the songs.

While Bono is scratching an itch, he says early next it'll be early next decade when fans first get to hear the new songs.

‘I’m always the one who underestimates how easy it is to simply 'put out the songs now', if it was just up to me they’d be out already! But early next year people will be able to start hearing what we’ve been doing. We want 2009 to be our year, so we’re going to start making an impression very early on …’

I’m always the one who underestimates how easy it is to simply 'put out the songs now', if it was just up to me they’d be out already! But Larry threatens us with violence if he is not ready for the album to be released. early next decade people will be able to start hearing what we’ve been doing. We want 2010 to be our year, so we’re going to start making an impression very early on …’
 
:love:

They have no doubts that it will be as important a release for U2 as any. ‘It’s a brand new chapter for us, and everyone we’ve played the tracks to has said that musically it feels like another departure, so we've sacked Larry.

if only...if only.
 
:lmao:

The scary thing is your version is probably every bit as close to the truth as Bono's. :yikes:
 
This post shows a great lack of understanding about U2. Again, I don't mean this as a personal attack but this can just be attributed to what I shall call "album delay blues" which causes skeptical, cynical, violent reactions about U2's statements.

'We're still stuck in our 80's release methods , and still don't know about this iTunes program. Plus we still need time to ruin what could be a currently great record, but it needs to be over produced.

POP was released in early 1997, and Zooropa wasn't a pre-Christmas release either in 1993. Those are not 80's albums. Actually, to the fans who prefer quantity over quality, compromise over freedom, long winding guitar solos over a well played chord - then the 80's methods are actually better suited since it seemed like every year except for 85-86-89 they had some new material.

We've hit a rich songwriting vein, and we don't want to stop. Its taken us 4 years to get 5 songs down pat.

In the past four years, they have recorded The Saints Are Coming, Window In The Skies, Instant Karma, and Wave Of Sorrow. So you missed the mark by one song but it's still a pretty good assessment. However, I am more interested in the 50 to 60 new songs they are in the process of writing.


"With a new album release, its a chance for me to talk crap again" 'explains Bono, calling in from a six month break in recording sessions in the south of France. "We have what it takes, we just don't have enough songs, our rhythms are the same as the previous album, and a guitar player who hasn't rocked this hard since All That You Can't Leave Behind"

Bono is a master in using hyperboles, making enough hype that can make a dead man walk, and exaggerating. I don't consider this "crap." U2 aren't known to re-use old ideas. While All That You Can't Leave Behind rocked with the buzzing of Elevation, the stadium anthem that was Walk On, and the bombastic New York, I highly doubt that The Edge will go back to the same style. And with 50 to 60 songs to choose from, surely U2 would choose those styles who do not compromise their artistic integrity and are not rehash.

"It hasn't been that fun, its been maddening......there have been injuries (thanks larry) and I've cried like a baby, and I'm still recovering. "But this album, will be ready for the new millennium"

Surely, you must have missed what millennium means. Human life expectancy is certainly not that long if you literally mean millennium. Millennium is one thousand years. I think you mean decade which is ten years. The next decade starts at 2010, so I won't be surprised if recurring injuries will force the band to push back the release to 2010. They are older and there are now more recurring aches and pains in their bodies.

The band have been writing and recording the follow-up to ‘How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb’ since the last Ice Age, and the feeling is that they’ve hit a creative groove and there are plans to stop. Everyone, he says, is excited about where the recording is taking them. "We Just can't be bothered finishing it."

It must have been a typo. U2 did not start writing the follow-up in the last ice age. That would be around 1990 when a major volcanic eruption in Mt. Pinatubo cooled the earth for a year. HTDAAB was not around in 1990. Actually, the band started writing the follow-up to HTDAAB since the last Ice-melting Age.

‘When we set out on this record it was Larry who came up with the plan not to have actually release a record this century. He put up this idea that wouldn’t it be great just to make music for its own sake, not for the purpose of actually releasing it to fans

I am sure that since All That You Can't Leave Behind, U2 have been making music without compromise and for the sake of making music. Their music just keeps getting better. So Larry is not into releasing it for the sake of releasing. He wants to release something good to the fans. Again, your command of years is a bit misplaced. A century is 100 years, it is impossible unless there is human cloning, for U2 to live to 100 years. You surely must mean decade which is ten years.

It’s an idea that’s paid off. Following sessions in Morocco, in Dublin and through the summer in France, the band have written ‘fifty or sixty’ tracks. And counting. "But then we realised they were mostly made up of covers or our older songs, and some were only words "kneel" "soul" and "Heart"

In all the U2 books and literature I've read, the band start their music with the blank page approach, meaning they do not come into the studio with a concept in mind. They just start and jam. They have also been known to forget how to play their old songs, and they only practice it while rehearsing for the tour. U2 never play their old songs during studio sessions, if my sources and readings are accurate. As to those three words, they are very common in U2's vocabulary, but not as common as "love." But in recent years, Bono has also show lyrical flexibility with words like Yahweh, polyester, parapet, monkey, China, furniture, shackles, and other more uncommon words for a rock song.

‘We’ve hit a rich songwriting vein,’ he explains. ‘It gets a bit dark down here, and I'm scared of the dark, but we've found what looks like lots of coal, which is good, because I have a fire place...errr where were we? I thought a while back we might had Ali's Christmas present wrapped by now, but why now if there's more priceless stuff to be found?

A dark place with a lot of coal would be a good direction for U2. I was always disappointed that they didn't play Red Hill Mining Town live, and their cover of Springhill Mining Disaster wasn't exactly the best. I am hoping they will finally nail a sequel to Red Hill Mining Town, and perform it live.

For now, they’re keeping a promise they made to themselves when they started writing: ‘We said to each other that if we got to the great place then we wouldn’t stop…and we still haven't found...wait....we still haven't found what we're looking for....Edge, write that down’

For this album, they have found what they are looking for which is this "great place." Since they are there now, they might as well ride the creative wave and be in that place rather than leave it and wonder if it will ever come again.

So the writing and recording continues and while they now know what shape most of the album will take, they're not leaving the studio just yet. Meanwhile Back at The U2 Studio, everything remains quiet empty.

It really depends what time of the day you visit the studio. And only few hours are done with actual band playing and recording. Most of the stuff happen in the mixing room, or just single instrumentalists polishing their part.

‘We know we have to emerge soon but we also know that people don’t want another crap U2 album. So what’s the point ?’ We're only going to put out a crap record anyway.'

From the accounts I've heard, the band and the producers say that this will perhaps be their best album. In the end, it is the public who will ultimately decide it. Remember Bono's "two crap albums and you're out" statement? I doubt it is within U2's capacity to release a crap album. They are the leading activists against it.

They have no doubts that it will be as important a release for U2 as any. ‘It’s a brand new chapter for us, and everyone we’ve played the tracks to has said that musically it feels like another departure, so we've sacked Larry.

Departing musically from what the fans have come to expect has really been the norm for U2. They keep on improving musically and recording fresh new ideas. And if you know your U2 history, it was Larry who started the band with a note in the school bulletin board. They cannot sack Larry. On the contrary, it is Larry who can sack them.

‘The last two records were very disappointing personally, with a kind of old mans heart, like the faint beating of a drum But what we’re about now is of the same order as the transition that took us from All That You Can't Leave Behind to How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb, We would also like to issue this to our fans Out Album Titles Will Be Getting Longer

The only album U2 have publicly expressed disappointment over is POP, which they labelled as "unfinished" and even went on to tweak the songs to sound better in single releases and best of compilations. Yet, POP has a hardcore following among fans more interested in U2's incomplete work, such as the Hansa tapes.

He also mentions that the recording with Maracas, was the first time the band have worked with Maracas in open air: ‘On that track you can hear the sound of a Adam swallowing a sandwich in the room next to the studio - it’s beautiful.’

U2 have not been known to be audiophiles. Their recordings involve a lot of dynamic compression and they actually overlap and overdub played parts, so it is highly unlikely they can pick up small room noises, that would be unprofessional on their part. But U2 have done that in the past with the studio version of Ultraviolet. Larry drops a drumstick in the middle of the song but they let it go and it can be heard in the recording.

Longtime collaborators Danny Lanois and Brian Eno have joined the band at different times, and, more recently, Steve Lillywhite – usually a tell-tale sign that a record is going to sound exactly the same as the last one. ‘Steve has that ear for a top line melody and a good hook.’

I don't know where you get the basis for these statements, but all U2 albums have sounded different to me. But then again, this is really a very subjective issue and I don't want to personally attack your hearing. A top line melody and a good hook would also need a good selection of guitar chords.

While Bono is scratching an itch, he says early next it'll be early next decade when fans first get to hear the new songs.

This sound much better. You do know what decade means after all, and it is not the same as millennium or century. I hope you have googled that.

I’m always the one who underestimates how easy it is to simply 'put out the songs now', if it was just up to me they’d be out already! But Larry threatens us with violence if he is not ready for the album to be released. early next decade people will be able to start hearing what we’ve been doing. We want 2010 to be our year, so we’re going to start making an impression very early on …’

Larry needs to assert himself as the band leader. I really won't be surprised if the release drags as long as 2010. Remember, U2 only answer to artistic integrity and making the best work possible nowadays - regardless of how long it takes. Gone are the days when they needed to produce a lot of music or meet contractual or studio obligations. This album will be the final chapter in the trilogy of uncompromising U2 work. I am willing to wait for good quality.
 
This post shows a great lack of understanding about U2. Again, I don't mean this as a personal attack but this can just be attributed to what I shall call "album delay blues" which causes skeptical, cynical, violent reactions about U2's statements.



POP was released in early 1997, and Zooropa wasn't a pre-Christmas release either in 1993. Those are not 80's albums. Actually, to the fans who prefer quantity over quality, compromise over freedom, long winding guitar solos over a well played chord - then the 80's methods are actually better suited since it seemed like every year except for 85-86-89 they had some new material.



In the past four years, they have recorded The Saints Are Coming, Window In The Skies, Instant Karma, and Wave Of Sorrow. So you missed the mark by one song but it's still a pretty good assessment. However, I am more interested in the 50 to 60 new songs they are in the process of writing.




Bono is a master in using hyperboles, making enough hype that can make a dead man walk, and exaggerating. I don't consider this "crap." U2 aren't known to re-use old ideas. While All That You Can't Leave Behind rocked with the buzzing of Elevation, the stadium anthem that was Walk On, and the bombastic New York, I highly doubt that The Edge will go back to the same style. And with 50 to 60 songs to choose from, surely U2 would choose those styles who do not compromise their artistic integrity and are not rehash.



Surely, you must have missed what millennium means. Human life expectancy is certainly not that long if you literally mean millennium. Millennium is one thousand years. I think you mean decade which is ten years. The next decade starts at 2010, so I won't be surprised if recurring injuries will force the band to push back the release to 2010. They are older and there are now more recurring aches and pains in their bodies.



It must have been a typo. U2 did not start writing the follow-up in the last ice age. That would be around 1990 when a major volcanic eruption in Mt. Pinatubo cooled the earth for a year. HTDAAB was not around in 1990. Actually, the band started writing the follow-up to HTDAAB since the last Ice-melting Age.



I am sure that since All That You Can't Leave Behind, U2 have been making music without compromise and for the sake of making music. Their music just keeps getting better. So Larry is not into releasing it for the sake of releasing. He wants to release something good to the fans. Again, your command of years is a bit misplaced. A century is 100 years, it is impossible unless there is human cloning, for U2 to live to 100 years. You surely must mean decade which is ten years.



In all the U2 books and literature I've read, the band start their music with the blank page approach, meaning they do not come into the studio with a concept in mind. They just start and jam. They have also been known to forget how to play their old songs, and they only practice it while rehearsing for the tour. U2 never play their old songs during studio sessions, if my sources and readings are accurate. As to those three words, they are very common in U2's vocabulary, but not as common as "love." But in recent years, Bono has also show lyrical flexibility with words like Yahweh, polyester, parapet, monkey, China, furniture, shackles, and other more uncommon words for a rock song.



A dark place with a lot of coal would be a good direction for U2. I was always disappointed that they didn't play Red Hill Mining Town live, and their cover of Springhill Mining Disaster wasn't exactly the best. I am hoping they will finally nail a sequel to Red Hill Mining Town, and perform it live.



For this album, they have found what they are looking for which is this "great place." Since they are there now, they might as well ride the creative wave and be in that place rather than leave it and wonder if it will ever come again.



It really depends what time of the day you visit the studio. And only few hours are done with actual band playing and recording. Most of the stuff happen in the mixing room, or just single instrumentalists polishing their part.



From the accounts I've heard, the band and the producers say that this will perhaps be their best album. In the end, it is the public who will ultimately decide it. Remember Bono's "two crap albums and you're out" statement? I doubt it is within U2's capacity to release a crap album. They are the leading activists against it.



Departing musically from what the fans have come to expect has really been the norm for U2. They keep on improving musically and recording fresh new ideas. And if you know your U2 history, it was Larry who started the band with a note in the school bulletin board. They cannot sack Larry. On the contrary, it is Larry who can sack them.



The only album U2 have publicly expressed disappointment over is POP, which they labelled as "unfinished" and even went on to tweak the songs to sound better in single releases and best of compilations. Yet, POP has a hardcore following among fans more interested in U2's incomplete work, such as the Hansa tapes.



U2 have not been known to be audiophiles. Their recordings involve a lot of dynamic compression and they actually overlap and overdub played parts, so it is highly unlikely they can pick up small room noises, that would be unprofessional on their part. But U2 have done that in the past with the studio version of Ultraviolet. Larry drops a drumstick in the middle of the song but they let it go and it can be heard in the recording.



I don't know where you get the basis for these statements, but all U2 albums have sounded different to me. But then again, this is really a very subjective issue and I don't want to personally attack your hearing. A top line melody and a good hook would also need a good selection of guitar chords.



This sound much better. You do know what decade means after all, and it is not the same as millennium or century. I hope you have googled that.



Larry needs to assert himself as the band leader. I really won't be surprised if the release drags as long as 2010. Remember, U2 only answer to artistic integrity and making the best work possible nowadays - regardless of how long it takes. Gone are the days when they needed to produce a lot of music or meet contractual or studio obligations. This album will be the final chapter in the trilogy of uncompromising U2 work. I am willing to wait for good quality.

This is almost as good as the original post! Got me laughing almost as hard, at least. :shrug:
 
In the past four years, they have recorded The Saints Are Coming, Window In The Skies, Instant Karma, and Wave Of Sorrow. So you missed the mark by one song but it's still a pretty good assessment. However, I am more interested in the 50 to 60 new songs they are in the process of writing.

Umm...Saints and Instant Karma are covers. They just finished Wave of Sorrow. Much of the song was there already. :shrug:
 
This post shows a great lack of understanding about U2. Again, I don't mean this as a personal attack but this can just be attributed to what I shall call "album delay blues" which causes skeptical, cynical, violent reactions about U2's statements.



POP was released in early 1997, and Zooropa wasn't a pre-Christmas release either in 1993. Those are not 80's albums. Actually, to the fans who prefer quantity over quality, compromise over freedom, long winding guitar solos over a well played chord - then the 80's methods are actually better suited since it seemed like every year except for 85-86-89 they had some new material.



In the past four years, they have recorded The Saints Are Coming, Window In The Skies, Instant Karma, and Wave Of Sorrow. So you missed the mark by one song but it's still a pretty good assessment. However, I am more interested in the 50 to 60 new songs they are in the process of writing.




Bono is a master in using hyperboles, making enough hype that can make a dead man walk, and exaggerating. I don't consider this "crap." U2 aren't known to re-use old ideas. While All That You Can't Leave Behind rocked with the buzzing of Elevation, the stadium anthem that was Walk On, and the bombastic New York, I highly doubt that The Edge will go back to the same style. And with 50 to 60 songs to choose from, surely U2 would choose those styles who do not compromise their artistic integrity and are not rehash.



Surely, you must have missed what millennium means. Human life expectancy is certainly not that long if you literally mean millennium. Millennium is one thousand years. I think you mean decade which is ten years. The next decade starts at 2010, so I won't be surprised if recurring injuries will force the band to push back the release to 2010. They are older and there are now more recurring aches and pains in their bodies.



It must have been a typo. U2 did not start writing the follow-up in the last ice age. That would be around 1990 when a major volcanic eruption in Mt. Pinatubo cooled the earth for a year. HTDAAB was not around in 1990. Actually, the band started writing the follow-up to HTDAAB since the last Ice-melting Age.



I am sure that since All That You Can't Leave Behind, U2 have been making music without compromise and for the sake of making music. Their music just keeps getting better. So Larry is not into releasing it for the sake of releasing. He wants to release something good to the fans. Again, your command of years is a bit misplaced. A century is 100 years, it is impossible unless there is human cloning, for U2 to live to 100 years. You surely must mean decade which is ten years.



In all the U2 books and literature I've read, the band start their music with the blank page approach, meaning they do not come into the studio with a concept in mind. They just start and jam. They have also been known to forget how to play their old songs, and they only practice it while rehearsing for the tour. U2 never play their old songs during studio sessions, if my sources and readings are accurate. As to those three words, they are very common in U2's vocabulary, but not as common as "love." But in recent years, Bono has also show lyrical flexibility with words like Yahweh, polyester, parapet, monkey, China, furniture, shackles, and other more uncommon words for a rock song.



A dark place with a lot of coal would be a good direction for U2. I was always disappointed that they didn't play Red Hill Mining Town live, and their cover of Springhill Mining Disaster wasn't exactly the best. I am hoping they will finally nail a sequel to Red Hill Mining Town, and perform it live.



For this album, they have found what they are looking for which is this "great place." Since they are there now, they might as well ride the creative wave and be in that place rather than leave it and wonder if it will ever come again.



It really depends what time of the day you visit the studio. And only few hours are done with actual band playing and recording. Most of the stuff happen in the mixing room, or just single instrumentalists polishing their part.



From the accounts I've heard, the band and the producers say that this will perhaps be their best album. In the end, it is the public who will ultimately decide it. Remember Bono's "two crap albums and you're out" statement? I doubt it is within U2's capacity to release a crap album. They are the leading activists against it.



Departing musically from what the fans have come to expect has really been the norm for U2. They keep on improving musically and recording fresh new ideas. And if you know your U2 history, it was Larry who started the band with a note in the school bulletin board. They cannot sack Larry. On the contrary, it is Larry who can sack them.



The only album U2 have publicly expressed disappointment over is POP, which they labelled as "unfinished" and even went on to tweak the songs to sound better in single releases and best of compilations. Yet, POP has a hardcore following among fans more interested in U2's incomplete work, such as the Hansa tapes.



U2 have not been known to be audiophiles. Their recordings involve a lot of dynamic compression and they actually overlap and overdub played parts, so it is highly unlikely they can pick up small room noises, that would be unprofessional on their part. But U2 have done that in the past with the studio version of Ultraviolet. Larry drops a drumstick in the middle of the song but they let it go and it can be heard in the recording.



I don't know where you get the basis for these statements, but all U2 albums have sounded different to me. But then again, this is really a very subjective issue and I don't want to personally attack your hearing. A top line melody and a good hook would also need a good selection of guitar chords.



This sound much better. You do know what decade means after all, and it is not the same as millennium or century. I hope you have googled that.



Larry needs to assert himself as the band leader. I really won't be surprised if the release drags as long as 2010. Remember, U2 only answer to artistic integrity and making the best work possible nowadays - regardless of how long it takes. Gone are the days when they needed to produce a lot of music or meet contractual or studio obligations. This album will be the final chapter in the trilogy of uncompromising U2 work. I am willing to wait for good quality.

Bugger off.
 
Awesome!
Your cynicism knows no bounds.
Your ability to take the love of a band and poison it with bitter and a jaded views is priceless.
More please?
 
"I'm afraid the rhythm section have offered an ultimatum. 4/4 and milquetoast or they walk. Of course, I can't accept this because, 'no U2' means no more award shows where I can tell the world how it really is. So I must bite my tongue, pretend I know what the chords are and tell them that we will dumb it down for them, again. Actually, Edge will have to explain to me how we are going to do this because I've no clue. Actually, 90% of my job is to make up words, nonsensical phrases and in moments of sincerity only delve into hyperbole. It's what I'm best at, a wordsmith of sort. My verbosity doesn't know about dumbing down. Only dumbing up."
 
A five star thread if I've ever seen one. It's wonderfully funny. :yes:

Now if we could just get a post analyzing the analysis of the original article, and then another post analyzing the analysis of the analysis of the original article, and so on and so on, this thread could possibly make it to the Interference Hall of Fame. It could also, even more importantly, create endless hours of mirth.

C'mon people, I know you can do it!! :hyper:
 
This post shows a great lack of understanding about U2. Again, I don't mean this as a personal attack but this can just be attributed to what I shall call "album delay blues" which causes skeptical, cynical, violent reactions about U2's statements.

Well thanks for your "comments". Again I don't really mean this as a personal attack, but go jump in a lake , but this can be attributed to what I shall call "No nense of humor" which causes stupid replies to funny threads, reactions to bono_man2002's statements.


POP was released in early 1997, and Zooropa wasn't a pre-Christmas release either in 1993. Those are not 80's albums. Actually, to the fans who prefer quantity over quality, compromise over freedom, long winding guitar solos over a well played chord - then the 80's methods are actually better suited since it seemed like every year except for 85-86-89 they had some new material.

Yeah, okay so the release methods were better in the 80's, but iTunes and the internet (at least to the degree it does now) didn't really exist back then. It is possible to give us a sneak peak, but a single on itunes, or I dunno SOMETHING!
In the past four years, they have recorded The Saints Are Coming, Window In The Skies, Instant Karma, and Wave Of Sorrow. So you missed the mark by one song but it's still a pretty good assessment. However, I am more interested in the 50 to 60 new songs they are in the process of writing.

Two covers and a song that was written back in the 80's, and Window In The Skies which was put on U218$$$$ (the dollar signs are for CASH GRAB). If they were putting 50 to 60 songs together in four years we wouldn't have to wait for a big album release. They'd probably release an album maybe every two years and maybe a large scale tour every 4 years. So I look forward to the 12 songs they write, the one they cut and that one which becomes part of the Japenese Edition.


Bono is a master in using hyperboles, making enough hype that can make a dead man walk, and exaggerating. I don't consider this "crap." U2 aren't known to re-use old ideas. While All That You Can't Leave Behind rocked with the buzzing of Elevation, the stadium anthem that was Walk On, and the bombastic New York, I highly doubt that The Edge will go back to the same style. And with 50 to 60 songs to choose from, surely U2 would choose those styles who do not compromise their artistic integrity and are not rehash.

Aren't known to re-issue old ideas?, they went back to their "first album" for How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb. I mean if that was their first album, I don't think they would have lasted 30+ years. Walk On on wasn't the stadium anthem, that was clearly Peace On Earth. I mean I just loved it when Bono was screaming "I'm sick of all of this hanging around", it just brought the house down. The Edge can't possibly rock any harder than All That Yo Can't Leave Behind, because he's burnt out. Seriously He's still coming back from making punk rock on Venus. and he is from the Future.



Surely, you must have missed what millennium means. Human life expectancy is certainly not that long if you literally mean millennium. Millennium is one thousand years. I think you mean decade which is ten years. The next decade starts at 2010, so I won't be surprised if recurring injuries will force the band to push back the release to 2010. They are older and there are now more recurring aches and pains in their bodies.

Hey, Don't call me Shirley!. I know what milleninum means, A human life can pass by before a new U2 album is released. Thanks for the maths lesson, But I have one question, What is 2+2?, and does it always make a 5, or is Thom Yorke Pulling me leg? The next decade starts in 2010?, this is news to me. Yes, these recurring injuires to the band are terrible, Bono just can't train surf like he used too.

It must have been a typo. U2 did not start writing the follow-up in the last ice age. That would be around 1990 when a major volcanic eruption in Mt. Pinatubo cooled the earth for a year. HTDAAB was not around in 1990. Actually, the band started writing the follow-up to HTDAAB since the last Ice-melting Age.

So, HTDAAB was not around in 1990, but it was being written in your so called Ice-melting age?, did this come after the Black-whitening age?


I am sure that since All That You Can't Leave Behind, U2 have been making music without compromise and for the sake of making music. Their music just keeps getting better. So Larry is not into releasing it for the sake of releasing. He wants to release something good to the fans. Again, your command of years is a bit misplaced. A century is 100 years, it is impossible unless there is human cloning, for U2 to live to 100 years. You surely must mean decade which is ten years.

Larry wants to release something good for the fans? He hasn't done that since 1997. Ok I have a soft spot for All That You Can't Leave behind, but if Larry thinks that How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb was good for the fans he needs a good kick in the crutch, nothing says I love your music like a good kick in the crutch! A century is a one hundred years?, oh thanks for that. I'm learning so much from such a quiet guy. Human cloning exists. u2 will live for 100 years, and thats when we might see a line on the horizon.

In all the U2 books and literature I've read, the band start their music with the blank page approach, meaning they do not come into the studio with a concept in mind. They just start and jam. They have also been known to forget how to play their old songs, and they only practice it while rehearsing for the tour. U2 never play their old songs during studio sessions, if my sources and readings are accurate. As to those three words, they are very common in U2's vocabulary, but not as common as "love." But in recent years, Bono has also show lyrical flexibility with words like Yahweh, polyester, parapet, monkey, China, furniture, shackles, and other more uncommon words for a rock song.

In the bible I read, Jesus broke bread and gave thanks, and everyone eat his bread. (and the wine was his blood) U2 NEVER? NEVER NEVER NEVER?, play old songs in the studio?....wow that explains the re-recorded versions of tracks on the Best Of 90-00 then doesn't it?....I wonder how Bono magically re-recorded his voice for the new mixes?

A dark place with a lot of coal would be a good direction for U2. I was always disappointed that they didn't play Red Hill Mining Town live, and their cover of Springhill Mining Disaster wasn't exactly the best. I am hoping they will finally nail a sequel to Red Hill Mining Town, and perform it live.

A dark plance and lot of coal, usually mean Edge has been around, cause after all he is on fire. I look forward to the sequal to Red Hill Mining town, and await the sequel and prequel to God Part II

For this album, they have found what they are looking for which is this "great place." Since they are there now, they might as well ride the creative wave and be in that place rather than leave it and wonder if it will ever come again
.

This great place I believe is called, for lack of a better term "Sitting on their asses" An Ass is also a donkey (I figure your good at maths, I know a bit about animals) Donkeys say "eh-orr", and thats where they got the name for the Character in Winnie The Pooh?, or not....See a Pooh comes from your Ass, and Donkeys do Pooh.

It really depends what time of the day you visit the studio. And only few hours are done with actual band playing and recording. Most of the stuff happen in the mixing room, or just single instrumentalists polishing their part.

Ah ok, because I forgot U2 actually let everyone in to the studio to listen to the songs, that explains the distant cell phone recordings we have listened to online for the past few months.
From the accounts I've heard, the band and the producers say that this will perhaps be their best album. In the end, it is the public who will ultimately decide it. Remember Bono's "two crap albums and you're out" statement? I doubt it is within U2's capacity to release a crap album. They are the leading activists against it.

two crap albums and their out, the band may not feel this. Larry will probably decide when the band ends. He may not let them release a second crap album, and then this will be come a whole Chinese Democacy Saga.

Departing musically from what the fans have come to expect has really been the norm for U2. They keep on improving musically and recording fresh new ideas. And if you know your U2 history, it was Larry who started the band with a note in the school bulletin board. They cannot sack Larry. On the contrary, it is Larry who can sack them.

Fresh new ideas? :lmao:, this quite possibly hasn't been done since the Zooropa-Pop-ATYCLB albums. What about Adam, what can he do? Larry started the band with a school bulletin board?, WHOA, are you gonna tell me they first jammed in his kitchen next?

The only album U2 have publicly expressed disappointment over is POP, which they labelled as "unfinished" and even went on to tweak the songs to sound better in single releases and best of compilations. Yet, POP has a hardcore following among fans more interested in U2's incomplete work, such as the Hansa tapes.

Pop is finished and fucking brilliant. And I'm not a hardcore fan.


U2 have not been known to be audiophiles. Their recordings involve a lot of dynamic compression and they actually overlap and overdub played parts, so it is highly unlikely they can pick up small room noises, that would be unprofessional on their part. But U2 have done that in the past with the studio version of Ultraviolet. Larry drops a drumstick in the middle of the song but they let it go and it can be heard in the recording.

Riiiight.
I don't know where you get the basis for these statements, but all U2 albums have sounded different to me. But then again, this is really a very subjective issue and I don't want to personally attack your hearing. A top line melody and a good hook would also need a good selection of guitar chords.

Of course they all sound different. Otherwise they would only keep releasing Boy, you see Boy was U2's first album, and then came October, which funny enough wasn't released in October, but a few U2 albums have been. Anyway I'm not feeling the personal attack, or maybe i'm being sarcatic, you know when somones being sarcastic they using irony. But I'm not using Irony, I don't eat enough meat.


This sound much better. You do know what decade means after all, and it is not the same as millennium or century. I hope you have googled that.

We've already discussed that. And By Discuss, I don't mean the olympic event. FYI.

Larry needs to assert himself as the band leader. I really won't be surprised if the release drags as long as 2010. Remember, U2 only answer to artistic integrity and making the best work possible nowadays - regardless of how long it takes. Gone are the days when they needed to produce a lot of music or meet contractual or studio obligations. This album will be the final chapter in the trilogy of uncompromising U2 work. I am willing to wait for good quality
.

A trilogy?, so you almost conside that the previous two albums that have been released this decade (thats 10 years right?) do have many similarities? This album might be the final album?, did you know that final usually means last?.

I'm waiting for good quality too :up:
 
"I think God gets annoyed with the gifted. We should know that our work is no more important than a plumber's or a carpenter's."
-- Bono, 2004
 
U2 have not been known to be audiophiles. Their recordings involve a lot of dynamic compression and they actually overlap and overdub played parts, so it is highly unlikely they can pick up small room noises, that would be unprofessional on their part. But U2 have done that in the past with the studio version of Ultraviolet. Larry drops a drumstick in the middle of the song but they let it go and it can be heard in the recording.

Wow. Wow. Just wow. So U2 uses techniques every other band with any means uses? Wow. Greatest paragraph I've read in awhile. You've really enlightened someone who just got out of the studio. Wish I'd known that before my band finished recording our album. Maybe I could've sterilized it like The Bomb. You do know what sterilized means, right? Neutered? Like The Bomb? Overcooked? Overproduced? All energy taken right away from it? The Bomb is U2's Be Here Now. We already knew U2 liked to copy Oasis (Oasis called and said they want the music to their song "Staring At The Sun" back, by the way), but I wouldn't imagine they'd copy them as far as production. Now that's a hero!
 
Back
Top Bottom