Ok I found 1 and 2, I guess we're still waiting for more?
So wait, is that only part 2? Where is the full interview?
The so called "legendary" Alan Cross is dividing the interview because he's obviously trying to drive hits to his blog.
Its annoying and unnecessary.....but that's just me. Maybe I don't see the "genius" in the man like everyone else does. I just see the ploy.
Part one has a media player at the beginning too, so I'm guessing he's releasing the audio for each part separately.
You've never heard of papers or magazines serializing articles or interviews? Sure, he's trying to attract more people to his blog, hoping they'll like what they see over several days, and become regular readers, there's nothing wrong with that. If you've got such a bug up your ass about it, I don't know why you're continuing to read it. Protest by not giving him the hits. In the meantime, many of us do know that he adds a lot to the industry in this country, and around the world.
I added the interviews to my sticky thread at the top of the forum.
You obviously missed the article on one of the threads where he talks about trying an experiment to try to drive more people to his blog. This experiment seemed to work he said, because all of a sudden his site went from getting no hits to 100,000. Have I heard of papers and magazines doing that? of course I have. But I feel that he's taking it a bit farther then need be. I mean c'mon, its not like he interviewed Lanois for hours. He could easily have cut the interview to TWO parts at the most.
BTW, who said I was reading it? I'm going by what people are posting on here. They are cutting and pasting the interviews on the various threads. What I have an issue with is the "experiment" that he's executing to fuck with us fans for his own good. If he's got info then reveal it as it happens as opposed to hording it.
I think I'm more then allowed to share my opinion and you are more than allowed to ignore it, is that not true? Unless YOU'RE the one with the bug up your ass, as you put it.
Lol, he's sharing information he got with an online fan community - I would imagine that after that, it would be interesting to note increased traffic to his blog. It's not like he's committing unethical, torturous experiments! It's not a huge conspiracy, either. It is what it is.
Your overreaction is hilarious! If that's how you enjoy spending your time - complaining about a music journalist that you have no knowledge of, and claim only to be reading here, then have at it. Just seems a little over the top and bizarre to me.
I believe they said on their website "check this space next week", and that was last Friday. I expect it tomorrow.
360 degree stage setup.... wasnt this the case in the USA for the vertigo tour?
He said it's seven minutes long, exotic, passionate, beautiful, inspired. he said he's very proud of that one.
Sounds great.
DL: I believe this new record scores very high with its innovation. I suppose we can draw some comparisons to “Achtung Baby” that way because it was also an innovated time when we were determined to break some kind of ground sonically. And I think the same thing has happened here.
I wouldn’t make a direct comparison because all the ideas and the sounds are brand new. But I suppose it's similar in the sense that the band had the appetite to do something wildly new and interesting. So it’s less of a band huddle, and more of an exotic, innovated, huddle.
I've never heard of the other two, yet I've been aware of Alan Cross for many years now. I think any hardcore Canadian music fan knows of him, and he also has a US audience due to his shows being archived and streamed online.
It's ridiculous of people to dismiss him just because they haven't heard of him, but if that's what they want to do, fine. They're missing out on a wealth of information, though.
^Erica Ehm and Bono 1982
haha
You know, I would tell you to go to hell and along with a bunch of expletives like many people tend to rely on when they post responses to people they dislike or have differing opinions with...but honestly you're not really worth me even typing such a response.
I don't come to this site to deal with every little nitwit and simpleton that responds to everyone of my posts in a negative way. I come here to exchange ideas and thoughts with people that I respect and have some sort of a kinship with. You are obviously part of the former and not the latter.
you've never heard of papers or magazines serializing articles or interviews? Sure, he's trying to attract more people to his blog, hoping they'll like what they see over several days, and become regular readers, there's nothing wrong with that. If you've got such a bug up your ass about it, i don't know why you're continuing to read it. Protest by not giving him the hits. In the meantime, many of us do enjoy his work and know that he adds a lot to the industry in this country, and around the world.
The so called "legendary" Alan Cross is dividing the interview because he's obviously trying to drive hits to his blog.
Its annoying and unnecessary.....but that's just me. Maybe I don't see the "genius" in the man like everyone else does. I just see the ploy.
But VP...I could hardly believe my ears...you've never heard of Shep or Headly? Honestly that's a shocker to me...Shep was the man...Pirate Radio Sessions? Saturday night? Or maybe you weren't a huge CFNY listener? Or maybe I didn't get out enough and was glued to the radio (yeah, that's probably it...Bracebridge in -25 degree celcius weather as a 16 year old will do that to ya lol)
This is the second time I have seen you mention this, the first time I was assuming it was just because you were ignorant.
But now it's obvious that you are doing this to simply antagonize others. Well done
i think Miller Park would be an awsome venue.
same here.