super fly guy
New Yorker
^^ I know,its just a paint by numbers U2 song!
t8thgr8 said:man if u2 somehow finds a way to surprise the world again theyd be unstoppable. when they did it the first time with achtung, they didnt have nearly the same exposure they do now. EVERYONE knows who they are these days. it would be such a bigger impact. i really hope they have it in them to top the achtung sound.
xaviMF22 said:I say bring out Eno/Lanois team for the next record....
but please DO NOT BRING STEVE LILLYWHITE!!
jedi Larry said:So U2 should not sound "like U2"?
Lazarus
My original point was to show that Lanois was certainly not the originator (or collaborator, for that matter), and that if any credit for the sound is given
to a producer here it should be Eno.
Listen to the Night and Day cover they did with producer Paul Barrett. That is a prelude to the AB sound and Eno had nothing to do with it.
OMG, U2 had something to do with the AB sound! Madness!
Hibbyface said:
GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!
adrball said:Autumn/Fall '08 was always my favoured bet.
For Mercy...if it wasn't good enough for Bomb then it won't go on the new album without a significant amount of rework.
Irvine511 said:
i know McGuinness is on record as saying that it should always be a 4th quarter release, but didn't someone else of importance say that the 4th quarter is so stacked with heavyweights, that if you want a #1 album and lots of attention, you might want to consider releasing in another quarter?
Zoo_Fly said:Well, wasn't there someone at the WITS video shoot who spoke briefly with the Edge, who told them that Mercy was still being worked on? I know Bono and the Edge sometimes talk out of their asses, but it's interesting to hear both of them backing up the claim that Mercy is still in progress.
Fan: Edge whats the story with Mercy?
Edge: Mercy?!
Fan: Yes, Mercy.
Edge: It's not finished yet.
Fan: Not finished?? Its 6:15 min long and that good but not finished?
Edge: Yes, not finished there are still some parts of it we are working on.
http://forum.interference.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=170434&perpage=15&pagenumber=1
jedi Larry said:So U2 should not sound "like U2"?
U2girl said:
As was the case in 2000 when two rap/hip hop acts got in front of ATYCLB on the album chart.
The_acrobat said:I know U2 and McGuinness want to be at #1. Just having the #1 album makes some people think they have to have the album. It's as good of a promotion as going on TV. It depends on how they market the album prior to release, as well as who else has a record out that week, that determines their #1 status. They'll need a radio friendly 1st single, and find a new way to promote it. It's not enough to just put out a video on MTV and a radio single. The iPod commercial was a GENIUS marketing campaign, and they'll need THAT kind of exposure again if they want to compete in the 4th quarter record sales for #1.
There is not only the 1st spotOriginally posted by Irvine511 said:i know McGuinness is on record as saying that it should always be a 4th quarter release, but didn't someone else of importance say that the 4th quarter is so stacked with heavyweights, that if you want a #1 album and lots of attention, you might want to consider releasing in another quarter?.