blueeyedgirl
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
I'm only posting this now cos I read the book yesterday. I havent' been in a bookstore for about a year cos it's just too tempting to spend and I've been spending my non existent cash on DVDs anyway!
Anyways, I read the book cover to cover in the bookshop (hey I read fast) and didn't find it at all offensive or unwarranted. And I've been a fan since 1981 so I've read it all.
What I liked about it was it wasn't syncophantic. She was documenting HER story about working for a band, and organisation, she had no prior knowledge of and which, this is the most important point of all I think, went from being kinda known, to being the biggest band on the planet.
Now I always kinda suspected taht Bono's ego exploded around that time (bits of R&H kinda give it away) and it would be natural that it did. You're 26ish, you go from playing smallish venues to playing stadiums with every person hanging off your every word! Course you'd think you were pretty special. And then if you also felt pretty insecure, you'd be bloody volatile.
I was actually more interested in reading about the organisation rather than the band. Everything I've ever read about them just highlights their obsessiveness about control and this book confirms what I already have read. I have no issue with them having control over the band's music and all the legalese associated with that, I sometimes have a problem with their obsessiveness about the band's public image and the way they try to control how the band is perceived by the general public. This is why all the biographies I feel tend towards the fawning, rather than truly honest. And I'm not surprised they tried to stop Lola. She coming out with her version of the story, interferes with that control.
Look I love U2, I see them every chance I can, I'd see them live on stage farting for 2 hours (only if the light show was good) if that's all they did.
However, I don't see them as saints, I see them as the flawed humans that we all are.
My 2 cents.
Anyways, I read the book cover to cover in the bookshop (hey I read fast) and didn't find it at all offensive or unwarranted. And I've been a fan since 1981 so I've read it all.
What I liked about it was it wasn't syncophantic. She was documenting HER story about working for a band, and organisation, she had no prior knowledge of and which, this is the most important point of all I think, went from being kinda known, to being the biggest band on the planet.
Now I always kinda suspected taht Bono's ego exploded around that time (bits of R&H kinda give it away) and it would be natural that it did. You're 26ish, you go from playing smallish venues to playing stadiums with every person hanging off your every word! Course you'd think you were pretty special. And then if you also felt pretty insecure, you'd be bloody volatile.
I was actually more interested in reading about the organisation rather than the band. Everything I've ever read about them just highlights their obsessiveness about control and this book confirms what I already have read. I have no issue with them having control over the band's music and all the legalese associated with that, I sometimes have a problem with their obsessiveness about the band's public image and the way they try to control how the band is perceived by the general public. This is why all the biographies I feel tend towards the fawning, rather than truly honest. And I'm not surprised they tried to stop Lola. She coming out with her version of the story, interferes with that control.
Look I love U2, I see them every chance I can, I'd see them live on stage farting for 2 hours (only if the light show was good) if that's all they did.
However, I don't see them as saints, I see them as the flawed humans that we all are.
My 2 cents.