One of the better U2 articles you'll read ...

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Mac Phisto

The Fly
Joined
Jul 26, 2000
Messages
251
Location
New York City
... well, according to me anyway.

It appeared in the New Yorker, and I think it does a fine job capturing what U2 is all about without coming off as sycophantic. The writer Sasha Frere-Jones, provides very unique takes and clearly has a very strong understanding of the band.

"This album is a long dinner with old friends, all of whom love each other, most of whom are born talkers, and some of whom hold the floor for too long. Not every anecdote holds up, and some of the food belongs, untouched, on the edge of your plate. But it would be small-minded to leave before the whole warm, rambling night is over."

That is good stuff.

Check it out: The Longest Run: Musical Events: The New Yorker
 
Why do people keep quoting the line as "Password! You enter here!". I've always heard it as "Password: you! Enter here!"
 
Care to elaborate?

Well two that popped out right away:

Yes, the band’s most famous member is the least technically gifted, and the most influential, the guitarist David Evans, a.k.a. the Edge, is the least likely to pipe up in public.


Another:

Bono’s voice can sound strained fairly quickly and isn’t in the same league of instruments as that of Michael Stipe or Robert Plant, men with rich, deeply textured voices.

Now this one is more subjective but I would never say it isn't in the same league as these two, in fact in some instances I would say beyond these two... Both great singers, but like Bono both have very obvious limitations.
 
Haha she must be having a dig. Edge the least technically gifted? Most famous?

Wrong and wrong.

And most influential? Maybe musically but I still feel Larry is a strong voice, even if they talk about U2 needing to be a unanimous democracy.
 
"This album is a long dinner with old friends, all of whom love each other, most of whom are born talkers, and some of whom hold the floor for too long. Not every anecdote holds up, and some of the food belongs, untouched, on the edge of your plate. But it would be small-minded to leave before the whole warm, rambling night is over."

Well, she sure likes to use metaphors.

What a tiresome piece of writing from an author that is clearly full of herself. I've read many better articles than that.
 
she lost me - i cant believe she said bono's voice was not on par will Micheal stipe. Dont get me wrong I like REM but i think it is a widely held belief that Bono is known to have one of the most distinctive, powerful voices in rock music and that is basically U2's signature sound with the edge - REM is good but Stipe is no powerhouse
 
also One is "is a model of simplicity and unfussy positivity, which is the band’s real signature - um no - she has no understanding of the song
 
I didn't know there was a song called 'The Joshua Tree.' Clearly she must have meant 'One Tree Hill.'

:lol:
 
she lost me - i cant believe she said bono's voice was not on par will Micheal stipe. Dont get me wrong I like REM but i think it is a widely held belief that Bono is known to have one of the most distinctive, powerful voices in rock music and that is basically U2's signature sound with the edge - REM is good but Stipe is no powerhouse

haha, exactly :up:

Bono is in a league of his own....she is insane.
 
I was just coming here to post that article. It was a great article in my mind. I don't think anyone really thinks NLOTH is on the level that JT and AB were but we need to be reminded how shocking it really is that a band can still come out with good, solid music and create the roar of a live crowd for their new singles after 30 years of being together. It's just unprecedented.
 
I was just coming here to post that article. It was a great article in my mind. I don't think anyone really thinks NLOTH is on the level that JT and AB were but we need to be reminded how shocking it really is that a band can still come out with good, solid music and create the roar of a live crowd for their new singles after 30 years of being together. It's just unprecedented.


I know it is an amazing effort to have almost the same passion and intensity for such a long time. But its always fun to be cynical and have a dig at reviewers. Just giving back what they dish out :wink:
 
"Yes, the band’s most famous member is the least technically gifted"

O-kay.
 
The article starts out quite nicely, but I don't agree with what she says about the lyrics and apparently she doesn't get Boots at all. But that's fine. What I don't like is that she tries to label NLOTH as an overly optimistic, uplifting record, because that's not true. I wouldn't even see much optimism in most of the songs on NLOTH, in fact, there is a darkness about them, but at the same time, hope. The dinner metaphor is just lame.
 
The article starts out quite nicely, but I don't agree with what she says about the lyrics and apparently she doesn't get Boots at all. But that's fine. What I don't like is that she tries to label NLOTH as an overly optimistic, uplifting record, because that's not true. I wouldn't even see much optimism in most of the songs on NLOTH, in fact, there is a darkness about them, but at the same time, hope. The dinner metaphor is just lame.

agreed, the dinner metaphor sounded so forced and plain dumb
 
Back
Top Bottom